I was talking to my GF about the Eurasia pack, and all around the packs from the past year or so. I also watched a YouTubers video on the slow and steady decline of community involvement. As much as I have enjoyed every animal that has been added into game, and I think every animal even “clones” deserve to be in here, I do think as time moved on each DLC has added less gameplay into the game. That doesn’t mean the DLCs haven’t done other things, like providing cool scenery or fleshing out regions with needed animals. If anything I have found the free DLCs have done more, but even then what might be exciting for all of us on the forum just may not be all that interesting to a majority of the players.
As to the Gameplay thing, if we look at what each DLC added this past year their hasn’t been much “new” animals to build with. The tropical pack added the Gibbon which has brachiation, one of only three animals in game to have it. It also added a monitor that deep dives, so if you don’t want a crocodile you have that. It also added a new flavor of WTE. The arid pack gave us the porcupine, it also gave us our first small cat in the sand cat. (I am not starting the arid pack argument, I have come around on it a lot. But while it did a great job adding some needed animals and fleshing out the Middle East, once you build an exhibit for one African ungulate you have built one for them all (obviously there are exceptions but then it is getting into it too much)) The Oceania pack gave us another flavor of WTE, and building for the kiwi is different as it is a burrowing bird. Likewise the little blue penguin can also use a burrow, but otherwise how different will its habitat be from the African Penguin? Finally the Eurasia pack added the Wolverine, which can climb and use the burrows! It also added the swan, the first waterfowl in game. Still, how different is building for the flamingos from the swan? Or crane? I know I am being overly pedantic, and people could probably point out a million small ways that building for x animal is different than Y animal. “Well the region, climate, and scenery are different. It’s also not the same species!” That is all true, and why I think every animal deserves to be in game. You may build the same habitat for a greater flamingo as you would an American, but that doesn’t mean the American flamingo doesn’t deserve to be in game. Though that is what I am trying to talk about, in terms of gameplay how different is a zebra, from a wild horse, to a Somali ass?
I often forget that us on the official forum probably makes up some of the most dedicated players to the game, so it can be easy to fall into a bias. I get Planet Zoo is a niche game, but we make up a niche of a niche if that makes any sense. So while I 100% agree the Wolverine, wild boar, takin, and wisent are needed and some awesome animals, it makes me wonder what the rest of the player base thinks? While we are certainly a dedicated bunch, we probably don’t even make up half of Frontiers sales. So it just makes me wonder, what do the rest of the player base want? When I talk to most people, they don’t even know what a takin or wisent even is. I know I am from North America so there is massive bias there, but I still wonder just how much do people care? Most people are pretty shocked that a zoo game doesn’t have parrots, and at this point in Planet Zoos run we have covered most of the Universal ABC zoo animals. So it still makes me wonder what is in store of the future.
I think what Planet Zoo could really use is something along the lines of a bird/ aviary dlc or an aquatic dlc. The thing is I don’t think it will happen though. Frontier has found a formula that works, and like I have mentioned in the past there has been financial issues and lay offs. That isn’t to say I don’t think planet zoo doesn’t need a South American dlc, or more monkeys. It’s just in terms of gameplay I think it could use those packs, especially to revitalize interest in the game. Especially it’s the new social media accounts. Still I expect the next dlc to be along the normal Frontier formula. And I am hoping it’s a Latin America/ South America. Still I have been thinking about Planet Zoos future a lot lately, what do you guys think?
If you split hairs like that, the only truly new thing this year was......nothing.
Every animal technically can be put in the habitat of another, the gibbon is another gibbon, monitor is a croc light, sandcat is a feline fenec fox, porcupine is a spiky aardvark, quokka is props the most unique as a weird kangaroo bunny rat, witht he ladder two being things we just do not have and the mute swan is another flavor of flamingo.
If you wanna do it like that, the only truly "new" animals would be flying birds and aquatics, with an argument for petting zoo animals, most importantly guinea pigs and rabbits as they arnt ungulates.
If we want to see it cynically, everything is the same, the red kangaroo uses ungulate paddocks, every climbing animal is the same and the only thing that differentiates animals are deep diving, climbing, group size and overall size.
But thats not very helpfull is it?
If you want "new gameplay" in a sandbox game that just gives us new goodies as dlc, then you have to hope for the free updates to actually make this game worth as a management game, cause thats where the gameplay lies if your unsatisfied with just building habitat nr 50+.
If building bores anyone, then new animals wont fix that, management updates will.
And for the building crowd, last year was amazing in an understated way of giving us more choices and variety.
I bring up this exampel for the 4. time or something, but before the arid pack, north africa was technically fine, but you had just so little variety in animals that your areas wernt defined by what you put in them as much as they were by how much you left out of the 4 animals we had. Now post arid, building a new north african area actually brings that choice, that breathing room for creativity of actually being able to pick and choose what goes there.
Are 5 ungulates in one pack excessive? Absolutly, but now we got a choice of 5 desert ungulates instead of just returning to the scimitar horned oryx all the time.
We have two small predators, 2 mid size predators, a domestic, an equiid and even some more base game animals that qualify if you want like the ostrich and cheetah to actually have a choice to build expansive and different north african areas instead of just another subsaharan africa savannah slog with maybe a desert subarea and even if you wanna build that, that desert subarea is now much more unique cause you got much more choice.
So while it wasnt exciting, the polish this year brought was wonderfull and easily overlooked and the only reason people are salty about it is SAs sorry state and the fact that the ungulate quota really was very high this year, both more then valid.
And anybody not hooked like this will not come back for birds and fish, or atleast not for more then one pack, valueable sales sure but even if we are the niche diehard fans of a niche game, any "casual" still playing the game and buying dlc is not so different to us here. If they are sitll playing and buying, its because the game how it is is fun to them and they like adding new flavors, even if they arnt mindblowing.