Universal Cartographics Galactic Record Breakers

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

R3tCrick3t

R
Kalpa said:
Okay let's start off traditionally...

IMAGE LINK 1 (PROOF THAT STUEMEAE KM-W C1-8086 SYSTEM IS 0.91LY FROM SAGITTARIUS A*)

IMAGE LINK 2
CLOSEST K-TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-8086 A AT 0.91 LY

IMAGE LINK 3
CLOSEST M-TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-8086 B AT 0.91 LY

IMAGE LINK 4
CLOSEST TERRAFORMABLE HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-8086 B 8 AT 0.91 LY

(in my opinion, the terraformable should also count for any parent planet category, in this case CLOSEST HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*, but if the jury disagrees...

IMAGE LINK 5
CLOSEST HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMAEA KM-W C1-8086 B 7 AT 0.91LY

or in fact any other of the 1 through 7, they are all high metal content planets - I just like to count them from outward, as things in farther out orbits will most likely (but not always) be closer to sagittarius A* at some point in time than others)


...now, as you might imagine this will get a bit tiresome pretty quickly. Could we accept navigation computer listings, like THESE THREE SCREENSHOTS (with more to come as I work my way outwards) as a proof for distance to Sagi A*, instead of me having to paste a separate galaxy map screenshot for every entry in these systems very close to Sag A*?

Also I feel kinda bad for taking credit for any/all of these, considering most of the systems have been visited before and there are first discovery credits just everywhere...
Click to expand...

first claimer is the record holder not the tag holder, stuff needs to be reported to us for us to know about it.

about the high metal contents (you are right) did you fill in the 7 page request form 12XXP J114 which after thorough investigation by our staff and approval will allow you to have an opinion :)
 

Kalpa

Kalpa
R3tCrick3t said:
about the high metal contents (you are right) did you fill in the 7 page request form 12XXP J114 which after thorough investigation by our staff and approval will allow you to have an opinion :)
Click to expand...

12XXP J114 form!? Son of a gun... I was told by the third secretary I should use 12XXP J110 form with the additional information form 10-A, stamped by the head archivist or his assistant only!

Anyway you guys have your work cut out for you, I did try my best to triplecheck all my posts, so it should be fairly straightforward copypaste duty (but please do another round of checking :D). Will continue exploring the area the day after tomorrow, or on Saturday at the latest.
 
Last edited:

R3tCrick3t

R
Kalpa said:
12XXP J114 form!? Son of a gun... I was told by the third secretary I should use 12XXP J110 form with the additional information form 10-A, stamped by the head archivist or his assistant only!

Anyway you guys have your work cut out for you, I did try my best to triplecheck all my posts, so it should be fairly straightforward copypaste duty (but please do another round of checking :D). Will continue exploring the area the day after tomorrow, or on Saturday at the latest.
Click to expand...

ALL RECORDS HAVE BEEN POSTED

I have not stamped anything and I am actually the 1st 2nd 3rd secretary and the archivists assistant are the same person (me)....

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

12XXP J110 form received, deleted all records and registration as requested :)
 
Last edited:

Fhreak

F
Guys I've been checking thre rules And have some doubts.
I found a system that has 3 Neutron Stars, same as the current record. Is it good for the book since it's the same as max or not?
If so is a Pic of the system enough or do I need to bring back the Cartography?
 

R3tCrick3t

R
Fhreak said:
Guys I've been checking thre rules And have some doubts.
I found a system that has 3 Neutron Stars, same as the current record. Is it good for the book since it's the same as max or not?
If so is a Pic of the system enough or do I need to bring back the Cartography?
Click to expand...

first one found is the record, sorry. picture is good, to get a record people need to claim the record in this thread.
 

Fhreak

F
Here it is, my biggest achievment in my little trip (2k LY) and still unclaimed. 3 Neutron Stars + more goodies



 

Cmdr Trav ElEr

C
Does it often happen that galaxy map star info doesn't match what is inside the system?

Made a big detour to this system touted as having a G0 I star that looked mighty big in the galaxy map. Scanned the star. And was really excited. 59 solar radii. Twice the current record for G-type stars. Then I saw the description. And it's a F-type star...


Interestingly, As it's a real star, it is designated as a G0 star IRL. So looks like Galaxy map is correct. But system map is wrong!

http://www.astrostudio.org/xhip.php?hip=3649
 
Last edited:

carazvan

C
Some distance records from me for once:

CLOSEST WOLF-RAYET STAR TO SOL
HIP 89535 AT 280.92 LY

CLOSEST WOLF-RAYET STAR TO HUMAN COLONY
HIP 89535 AT 78.13 LY FROM PAND

Records outdated look below 2 posts for new ones
 
Last edited:

carazvan

C
Well this was the shortest I've taken to beat my own record

CLOSEST WOLF-RAYET STAR TO SOL
GLIESE 283 B AT 22.53 LY - CMDR NAVZARTON

CLOSEST WOLF-RAYET STAR TO HUMAN COLONY
GLIESE 283 B AT 12182Ls FROM STONE'S LEGACY - CMDR NAVZARTON

OLDEST WOLF-RAYET STAR
GLIESE 283 B AT 13,074 MILLION YEARS - CMDR NAVZARTON

SMla6I6.png
HJlt61f.png
isx8kmi.png
HdBDGyu.png
 
Last edited:

carazvan

C
Patau82 said:
can you get a pic from landing pad of the station for closest to human colony record if you're still in that system?
Click to expand...

I can go back there and try .. the station is actually one of the hardest to land at because you have to intentionally try and 'overshoot' because otherwise it moves too fast for regular speed to make it there.
Definitely a weird system.

Btw. Noticed it was the oldest WR star also
 

Patau82

Patau82
carazvan said:
I can go back there and try .. the station is actually one of the hardest to land at because you have to intentionally try and 'overshoot' because otherwise it moves too fast for regular speed to make it there.
Definitely a weird system.

Btw. Noticed it was the oldest WR star also
Click to expand...

wow sounds interesting! I'm defiantly going to check it out when I get back, I'm currently on a short trip looking for systems with terraformable or earth like worlds 300-1000ly out from inhabited space for that community goal :D

edit: also added as oldest to book! nice to see there's still records to break in systems so close to home
 
Last edited:

R3tCrick3t

R
OLDEST L-TYPE STAR
SIFI BV-J B52- 1 B AT 18,279 MILLION YEARS - CMDR RUKMEROT
rr2p95.jpg
OLDEST T- TYPE
SIFI BV-J B52- 1 C AT 18,279 MILLION YEARS - CMDR RUKMEROT
fdh74m.jpg
 

Ambivalent

A
Patau82 said:
wow sounds interesting! I'm defiantly going to check it out when I get back, I'm currently on a short trip looking for systems with terraformable or earth like worlds 300-1000ly out from inhabited space for that community goal :D

edit: also added as oldest to book! nice to see there's still records to break in systems so close to home
Click to expand...


I was interdicted on my return trip last time I came back to civilization while scanning an earth-like so it must be been close to civilization, sadly I didn't keep a note of which one it was though or I'd share it! But from memory is was in a line back to civilization travelling from HIP 99982 through HIP 99411 and it was a K type! Good luck with your search :)
 

Ferris

Ferris
Not a record but i thought it was interesting...
I have found quite a few irregularly shaped gas giants but this is the first time i have seen an irregular planet.

Screenshot_0030.jpgScreenshot_0032.jpg

and a couple of shots from my recent visit to the Bubble Nebula

Screenshot_0033.jpgScreenshot_0035.jpgScreenshot_0038.jpg
 

Kalpa

Kalpa
It's strange how randomly ED seems to generate oblateness in objects, I'm sure everyone's seen these brown dwarves rotating very rapidly, with periods measured in tens of seconds, yet they seem to be completely round (or like that one star in one video I forget which and where, it seemed to rotate in just a few seconds). Then we get a planet with 2 hour rotational period and suddenly it's oblate.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom