*slow clap and salute* Maahhhhhvelouth!
Lord John fin: Where are we going?
The Red Lectroids: Planet Ten!
Lord John fin: When?
The Red Lectroids: Real soon!
2 ways to fixing this
1. Make NPCs as dangerous as players
2. Make Open more rewarding
Pick one and the job is done
Yes I do, and yes I could.
There has never, not once, ever been an argument presented on these boards to explain why the solo game has to be as difficult as the open game. Nobody has explained why they feel AI has to be as tough as human opponents to those who choose to avoid human opponents.
This is like playing something like Halo and demanding that easy mode not only be removed from your own game but from everyone elses too.
The reddit community is as good a sample as this one, here. Both links are the same poll for context in reddit.
I d say both your poll and mine are exactly as representative. You may disagree but that is you.
If you want to really argue on data the only way is FDEV´s. Everything else, including our polls is pure speculation.
I will disagree with this only from an analytical standpoint. If your looking for a sample population for representation you want that population to be as accurate as possible. For ED where you have to have an account, and if I remember correctly also have bought the game to be on the forums, you have a verified sample population. With Reddit you have unverified outliers. You have no real verification that they have bought the game unless you get each ones CMDR Name and can verify that they are in the game and that the person on reddit claiming to be them is them. There is to much unverified data in the reddit polls to be considered an accurate representation of the ED community in Solo/Private/Open type polls.
Not so, I'm afraid - not the general forum, anyway.... and if I remember correctly also have bought the game to be on the forums...
You can't really say open is full of anti-social types. Open is social by definition and the game encourages killing. The anti-social players are the ones in solo mode (the name gives it away).
The problem is there's no true high and low security areas. Anarchy means nothing. You can go to sol and happily gun down players and only get a slap on the wrist (if there were any players in sol).
Make solo only available upto competent in any discipline?
Because fairness. As a solo player you have the same tools to affect the universe and the background simulation as open players, just without the risk.
Remember solo isn't an offline mode, you are playing in the same universe as me, except I can't come and stop you from doing whatever it is I don't like you doing to my game. Now if only you had to actually work and take risk to do that it wouldn't be so bad.
No.. hell no, no way... you are going to force people into open until they are competent in a discipline? Why?
Looks like the makings of another threadnaught!
We all know the answer to that question, amirite ?![]()
I will disagree with this only from an analytical standpoint. If your looking for a sample population for representation you want that population to be as accurate as possible. For ED where you have to have an account, and if I remember correctly also have bought the game to be on the forums, you have a verified sample population. With Reddit you have unverified outliers. You have no real verification that they have bought the game unless you get each ones CMDR Name and can verify that they are in the game and that the person on reddit claiming to be them is them. There is to much unverified data in the reddit polls to be considered an accurate representation of the ED community in Solo/Private/Open type polls.
You dont need to have the game to be on these forums. No need to have an analytical standpoint either.
None of the polls around can be used in any serious degree to justify arguments in this thread, especially when you have them suggesting opposite scenarios. Only FDEV´s actual data can bring some light.
Until then let´s stop the gratuitous and totally speculative poll based arguments please. Let´s just agree to be speculative irrespective of the poll because it s fun.
Only FDEV´s actual data can bring some light.
in the absence of any firm data, we should stop all speculation as to the population of any of the modes....
There are some really good comments being made in this thread recently.
You dont need to have the game to be on these forums. No need to have an analytical standpoint either.
None of the polls around can be used in any serious degree to justify arguments in this thread, especially when you have them suggesting opposite scenarios. Only FDEV´s actual data can bring some light.
Until then let´s stop the gratuitous and totally speculative poll based arguments please. Let´s just agree to be speculative irrespective of the poll because it s fun.
To anyone suggesting drop solo....
I say look at it this way. IF a mode had to be dropped i COULD say drop open.... Keep private groups where people can socially play together or fight or what ever, and keep solo.
This would suit me just nice...... But DO I say this??
No because I try not to be a mean person who wants to ruin the game for those who CHOOSE to play in open..... but drop open is just as valid - and selfish - an attitude as drop solo imo.
It's amusing to see everyone dancing around the poll issue...![]()
I d say it is the opposite, more than two thirds would be the ones with influence. No selfishness there that I can see.
70% prefer to play in open. My poll is right, yours is wrong.
https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/39w6yn/poll_pvp_interest_and_powerplay_impact/
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1l2...-J895P1rHidA20/viewanalytics?usp=form_confirm
Honestly, stop the poll based argument nonsense please? Only FDEV has the actual data.