Ooooh. I like this idea. Fits in nicely with the lore too.
Find one quick before the Roswell style coverup! they'll blame weather balloons or swamp gas, and haul that barnacle outta there....
Ooooh. I like this idea. Fits in nicely with the lore too.
I think there's a lot of confusions about POIs/Blue Circles/Permanent sites on planets. I think it's addressed in one of the top posts of this thread. Rizal's been updating them like a fiend. I believe the difference, and you'll have to take this with a grain of salt because I can't currently run Horizons, is that there are things (sites, settlements, crashed ships, etc.) that randomly pop-up, like signal sources do in space and are shown as the blue circles when you get near. Then there are sites, like ship graveyards, that are permanent and do not have a blue circle when you get near. They can only be spotted visually. MB has said that large barnacles have been placed by hand and randomly placed. Many of us are assuming that this means they can only be spotted visually/auditorially, and not by searching through the blue circles when they pop up. There's a bit of a leap there in assuming they don't, but I think that the blue circle POIs are always non-permanent, yes?
I think you'll notice one if you're nearby.
And to those asking why nebulae - it's quite logical if you think about it
Michael
I'm with you all up until the UA connection. I think your UA theory makes sense only if you ignore the intelligent behavior exhibited by them. Add in the ship scanning, stellar object-identifying, and morse-blaring aspects of the UA, and they seem far too advanced to be simply space-sperm.
Aesculon Phaia was talking earlier about mist getting generated as the surface heats up and gases sublimating out of the rock, and also about eclipses providing sufficient darkness/coolness to offer a barnacle protection to come out and feed. I've been in a canyon on an otherwise unmisty planet surface during an eclipse, and it got really misty for the duration, so I think there's also a mechanic going on when the temperature drops significantly.
Now on a connected but different note - I think (and others have already said here) that barnacles are to be found in nebulae because they are rich with dust particles to provide food, in the same way that barnacles in the sea feed from the nutrients in the medium around them. There's no food in regular space. So this means that the planet type (metal content etc) is not the food - barnacles do not feed from their substrate. The planet type WILL be important, but in providing good conditions for the barnacle to root to (Rocky?)
So now to guess at the right places on a planet in a nebula. We could go for high ground being more sticky-outy in to the nebulous yumminess... or... low ground where mists accumulate, AND nebula dust pulled in by gravity will collect and concentrate. So my money is on low ground - canyons maybe, but craters I think will create a more concentrated nebula soup (although canyons could create a flow).
Tidally locked? No, no, NO. Tidally locked would render the environment static. No sublimating gases, no temperature differentials (remember meta alloys are excellent thermal insulators).
And as others have cleverly said, possibly NOT the polar regions where any magnetic fields would prevent nebula snacks from getting on down to the barnacle party.
MB's comment that we would definitely notice one if we were near it. Well perhaps they are pretty big and obviously barnacle-esque, but also maybe they make a big wailing sound like a UA? Perhaps it would take a UAs presence to trigger it.
Finally for now - Some people have discounted the UA bubble as being connected but I think the UAs could be a part of the barnacle's breeding cycle and they are equidistant from Merope because they were spawned there by a mature barnacle and have spread out to search for and pollinate/inseminate any barnacles they find. They have their 'head' aligned to Merope but they spin so that the two faces with the 7 markings (one for each metalloid type?) cast their signal sideways to that orientation in 360 degrees, like a lighthouse. If I'm right, that would mean that there are barnacles in Merope system.
I think that's about it for now.
------------------------------------
edit: Aaaand the thread moved forward two and a half pages while I wrote that, Jeeeeeesus!
The more time they spend on hunting you down, the less likely is their success in finding anything of worth.
That kind of behaviour usually is reduced by jump range and fuel reservoir.
But on the other side greed and envy do define humanity.
The thread has exploded because MB has been tickling our fancies.
Don't dolphins seem to be far too intelligent to be simple mammals, aswell?
Their means of navigation might have evolved due to the environment their parents grow up in.
Vision won't be useful in dust clouds, sonar will be
Why would a UA "draw" a ship in morse-code it has scanned,
why does the computer say we are being scanned?
Because the wave-length they use for scans is identical or similar to ship sensors,
and the image drawn is the way they "see" our ships and communicate with each other.
Does that sound logical?
Morse code is a very easily intelligible code,
with the low pitched humms it has a long distance it can possibly travel.
I learned in my study to become a telecommunications technician, that
a lower frequency is beneficial on transmission, travelling longer ranges.
Yeah, the intelligent behaviour could be a problem, but as Simulacrae just said it could be Cyprid stage, and the lifeforms could have some intelligence. The morse is a problem though, but maybe mum learned it from explorers.
To test it all out I've just taken a timed Mensa IQ test in competition with a petri dish of my sperm. I failed but the sperm passed and has been invited into Mensa's inner circle as their new leader.
Thread #4 is the place which you can find more info on some of those theories.Ooooh. I like this idea. Fits in nicely with the lore too.
You make good points, but they just seem to be far more probe/listening post than early-stage life form to me.
Although if they are larval stage barnacles, and we hypothesize that barnacles eat metals, it would explain both UA's harming our ships and the station malfunctions. We could be growing barnacles in our starports...
Just rewatched those. Boba Fett goes out like a punk.
Right, that's it - I'm finally getting in my ship...
I'm going to find it.
And by 'it', I mean tea, of course. And lots of it!!!
Right, that's it - I'm finally getting in my ship...
I'm going to find it.
And by 'it', I mean tea, of course. And lots of it!!!
Yeah, the intelligent behaviour could be a problem, but as Simulacrae just said it could be Cyprid stage, and the lifeforms could have some intelligence. The morse is a problem though, but maybe mum learned it from explorers.
To test it all out I've just taken a timed Mensa IQ test in competition with a petri dish of my sperm. I failed but the sperm passed and has been invited into Mensa's inner circle as their new leader.
Right, that's it - I'm finally getting in my ship...
I'm going to find it.
And by 'it', I mean tea, of course. And lots of it!!!
Thread #4 is the place which you can find more info on some of those theories.
Sorry, I wont dig it up - too much posts![]()
He totally does. I've never really understood his appeal. I assume it was because he had a cool toy. I was a little young for OG Stars Wars toys. Serously though, he does next to nothing in Empire and Jedi, and is super-easily defeated. Even if you're referring to the expanded universe stuff about how he didn't die, he's still a punk. I'd rather know more about the lizard guy who didn't get eaten.Or does he...?