From what you are saying about the Fed rep - can you not see that it is a choice made by the player to achieve this? The game has various mission types each with a reward of influence towards the rank desired, the number of missions you need to complete would be lower if you take the higher ranked missions - again a form of choice given to you to help reduce the amount of time required to get the rank you want. It is your own desire that has created the need to do the work, it's all been your choice to satisfy this self made need/want.
Ranks maybe, but ships is a stickier issue. Unless there's another way to get a ship locked by a Federation rank - and as far as I know there hasn't been an event allowing that like there was for the Empire (yet) - players looking to obtain said ship haven't got any other choice but to start grinding those beans, high yield or otherwise. Personally I'd prefer Empire though, not because of ideology but because of the Cutter, because it's gorgeous. [heart]
This is a debate that will continue to crop up on the forums and in my own opinion is a direct result of the 'Have now' generation who seem to think every thing should be handed to them on a plate as opposed to working for it. Let's put the question a different way: If you were given access to the ship on the understanding that you would only work towards the rank until it is achieved, would you still take the ship?
This meme reflects badly on you, Bran. It's built on limited perspective, blanket assumption and pettiness of spirit, and possibly a fundamental denial of the effects of evolutionary process on thinking and technology. I occasionally hear it repeated by angry Boomers - does that mean I should assume all members of that generation are guilty of these things? Absolutely not. Open your mind, Quaid. Open your miiiiiiind~
[video=youtube;jlkKYpnFu5o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlkKYpnFu5o[/video]
Last edited: