2.3 dev update feedback mega thread

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
If by terrorists you mean a minority, when was the last time that Frontier "capitulated"?

Maybe it's me but I didn't have to read very far [on the forums] to stumble across post after post of questions asking about non-combat related content. That would suggest that a sub-set of the player base were in some way being favoured by 'baffling' [read the post I quoted] priorities that FDev seem to apply to what they're going to work on.

It didn't take long to identify a few children that seem more interested in scaring away the others then complaining that nobody wants to play with them. Could these be the same sub-set [shock]? Is it mere coincidence that despite content that appears to have been built to make them happy they're still not, and they're making everyone suffer?

Since they'll probably make us all suffer anyway, why are they still being rewarded for it?
 
Maybe it's me but I didn't have to read very far [on the forums] to stumble across post after post of questions asking about non-combat related content. That would suggest that a sub-set of the player base were in some way being favoured by 'baffling' [read the post I quoted] priorities that FDev seem to apply to what they're going to work on.

It didn't take long to identify a few children that seem more interested in scaring away the others then complaining that nobody wants to play with them. Could these be the same sub-set [shock]? Is it mere coincidence that despite content that appears to have been built to make them happy they're still not, and they're making everyone suffer?

Since they'll probably make us all suffer anyway, why are they still being rewarded for it?

That's some impressive leaping between points of non-logic. Oh well, can't satisfy professional victims so I don't think I'll bother shutting you down again. You'll just throw a temper tantrum somewhere else looking for attention.

Oops, forgot to wrap that last bit in quote tags...
 
That's some impressive leaping between points of non-logic. Oh well, can't satisfy professional victims so I don't think I'll bother shutting you down again. You'll just throw a temper tantrum somewhere else looking for attention.

Oops, forgot to wrap that last bit in quote tags...

Oh hello stalker, were your cutesey wickle ears burning? So cute, little lamb following me <3

Edit: Here it is look, I went and found it for you ;)

Oh you silly sausage!

If you were ignored would you really go away, or throw another tantrum for attention?
 
Last edited:
Has it been brought up that some ships like the ASP Explorer will have broken multi-crew ?

- Hard point placement does not allow 360° firing arc for the gunner
- No SLF hangar

What will the crewman do ?

Hopefully SRV control when that's added, thanks to it's bank of small weapons the Asp ex makes a great ground attack ship so the two will work well together.
 
Hopefully SRV control when that's added, thanks to it's bank of small weapons the Asp ex makes a great ground attack ship so the two will work well together.

new SRV types would be nice ( exploration, one with better airborne, a mining rig, there is lots of room for creative and deeper gameplay)
 
I have not read this entire thread but has there been any mention of the next set of Engineers (presumably 5 more??) or new blueprints for 2.3?

I know how badly the exploration community covets Lori J's G3 shielded fuel scoop, now there's one that could use a bit of variety eh? =)
 
I have not read this entire thread but has there been any mention of the next set of Engineers (presumably 5 more??) or new blueprints for 2.3?

I know how badly the exploration community covets Lori J's G3 shielded fuel scoop, now there's one that could use a bit of variety eh? =)

No news. But FD better not make a newsletter about engineers and call it news.
 
I have not read this entire thread but has there been any mention of the next set of Engineers (presumably 5 more??) or new blueprints for 2.3?

I know how badly the exploration community covets Lori J's G3 shielded fuel scoop, now there's one that could use a bit of variety eh? =)

Can we have access to that mate of Palin's that builds the corrosion resistant cargo racks? Maybe they can do something that lets you stack two class 1 modules in a class 2 slot. Or, maybe (1x1)+(1x2) in a Class 3 slot for a 3D printer to sit above the SRV hangar with materials for a couple of spares in case we blow one up?
 
Can we have access to that mate of Palin's that builds the corrosion resistant cargo racks? Maybe they can do something that lets you stack two class 1 modules in a class 2 slot. Or, maybe (1x1)+(1x2) in a Class 3 slot for a 3D printer to sit above the SRV hangar with materials for a couple of spares in case we blow one up?

Splitting slots would make the combat balance far worse than it already is. Pls no.
 
If by terrorists you mean a minority, when was the last time that Frontier "capitulated"?

Where to start?

SRV Fuel, Module Transfer, Ship Transfer.

PowerPlay Rewards being gimped.



Pretty much every time the forum Grognards whine Frontier folds faster than Superman on laundry day.
 
my take on 2.3
https://youtu.be/MchofaCb2mQ

(boring Sunday, sorry ;) )

OMGOMGOMG, so biased! What about HER face!?
MMORPG = Mostly Men Online Role Playing GIRLS!
Why? If you're going to have to follow it around...
May as well have some nice 'assets' to look at ;)

Oh wait, we only get first person view? Oh well, have some rep for effort anyway :D

- - - Updated - - -

Splitting slots would make the combat balance far worse than it already is. Pls no.

Your OCD doesn't complain about those two class 2 scanner bays being half empty?
 
Last edited:

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
Where to start?

SRV Fuel, Module Transfer, Ship Transfer.

PowerPlay Rewards being gimped.



Pretty much every time the forum Grognards whine Frontier folds faster than Superman on laundry day.

.... except Ship and Module transfer was determined by an official vote (off the forums, to ensure eligibility to vote) and the result was 70%/30% in favour of delayed. That's hardly capitulating to a minority.
 
Ok I think I might have missed something when it comes to the whole telepresence thing and multi crew. I just read in another thread that even when or indeed if I was to invite someone onto my python the chair to my right will still be empty?
 
Ok I think I might have missed something when it comes to the whole telepresence thing and multi crew. I just read in another thread that even when or indeed if I was to invite someone onto my python the chair to my right will still be empty?

Hopefully not. That's the whole point of multicrew. Watch the trailer. People are talking about telepresence because it reminds them of the SLFs stupid lore explanation but Frontier Did not say anything about this.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom