I did not know that I had to renew my paintjobs periodically :O
It is necessary to follow the fashion
I did not know that I had to renew my paintjobs periodically :O
What exactly do they need to "make right"?
Did they announce with the introduction of Horizons that all future content would be "paid" DLC? If so, I must have missed that part.
To my knowledge, they've introduced plenty of other content to the game that wasn't paid DLC.
This is what people complain about when they say they want a real roadmap set in stone.
Forget money. It's not about money.
We want to know that our TIME is being well invested in this game, because our TIME is our most valuable asset and an entire year is a significant portion of TIME to be throwing around.
To be honest, I've seen games with far less than ED as regards content, playability, looks, and updates, and paid a hell of a lot more for them too! I suspect some people are expecting just a little too much for their money. My personal opinion is that ED provides value for my coin - so far! I hope they continue to do so.
(I also do not know what they are going to "Make right"...I wasn't aware of anything wrong.)
![]()
Even sadder, the issue the OP raises isnt that he doesnt get enough for his money, but that others get it for free as well. And he wants to be compensated for that tragic fate he now suffered: knowing other people have fun. Like those people whose vacation is ruined when they learn someone else on the same plane paid less for their ticket.
There's a current flowing through modern sensibilities that if someone has something good you didn't get (whether realistically deserved or not), that it translates to a direct attack upon them rather than the other person simply having a better deal. It's kind of sad that there's less being happy for others' good fortune, and more of seeing it as a diminishing of your own fortune when nothing has been actually taken away.
There's a current flowing through modern sensibilities that if someone has something good you didn't get (whether realistically deserved or not), that it translates to a direct attack upon them rather than the other person simply having a better deal. It's kind of sad that there's less being happy for others' good fortune, and more of seeing it as a diminishing of your own fortune when nothing has been actually taken away.
'Every time a friend succeeds I die a little.' Gore Vidal
True, and this applies everywhere. People feel "attacked" over everything now.
"This person waited for a sale and got this game for less? DISCRIMINATION!!!"
"Your opinion differs from mine? You've practically smacked me in the face!"
etc...
As far as the LEP is concerned, I believe it will net people lots of neat content soon enough. I wish I had an opportunity to nab one, but I play on console. I'll just hope the prices are good. Usually are. :3
As an LTP owner, my thoughts are we should put the Cobra 4 up dor sale at the store. It provides no serious advantages and I’d like to see more of them around in commander hands. I do love my CM4. Right now it’s set as an excellent surface raider.
Why do you feel the need to apply arbitrary descriptors?
Do yourself a favor and go google some articles on the controversy that's been surrounding microtransactions on high profile games over the last year. What you think a subscription is, and what the gaming industry thinks a subscription is, are two entirely different things and their definition is very broad and open to interpretation.
None of it is directly relevant, but it will give you some insight on just how different a financial expert's description of voluntary is compared to yours.
Why should they limit their sources of income to silly boundaries set by a dictionary description? Webster didn't write the guide to financial success. They can't even afford to print physical copies anymore.
Access is stopped if you stop buying cosmetics, just not immediately. When ED becomes unprofitable the servers will shut down. No ambiguity about that. It's an online game and online games cost money. FDev is not obligated to go in the red for you.
The median age on this forum is really starting to bite it's own tail in it's ignorance on just how the gaming industry works.
You seem to be saying here that microtransactions for cosmetics is essentially the same as a paid subscription model, but in fact the two are fundamentally different.
With a paid subscription model, the ownus is on the customer to pay to get access to the current game content, that content could stay the same for years, but you would still have to pay every time you wanted to see it.
With FD's model, the ownus is on *them* to constantly come up with new content that ppl will want to buy cosmetics for and keep that income stream alive.
I know which model I'm more comfortable with, and tbh I've got huge respect for FD for choosing that path and making it work.
Whatever the actual differences are between a subscription model and a microtransactions model, the one you've created there is forced and based on a deliberately obtuse interpretation of the subscription model in which, for reasons best known to yourself, you decided to completely ignore the fact that developers of subscription games do in fact constantly have to come up with new content to keep players interested and paying.
The onus is on the developer in both cases.
In the subscription model the onus is on the developer to keep producing content which is sufficiently entertaining that players continue to renew their subs; when they fail to do that the game usually moves into free-to-play, as has happened with some high profile subscription games.
In the microtransaction model the onus is on the developer to create sufficiently interesting content that players want to buy it, even though it will often be cosmetic only and have no direct impact on their performance within the game.
I never said I was attacked, simply that the business model had changed
IF I have lost anything it is that FD wont have the extra monies raised by expansions to develop the game more
I never said I was attacked, simply that the business model had changed
IF I have lost anything it is that FD wont have the extra monies raised by expansions to develop the game more
This thread is not what I expected, was about to wax about the birds and the bees.
Source? Because I can't remember they said any of that.When Horizon's was announced they said it would cost £40 and future seasons would be the same about every year or so and the current path was about ten years of seasons if things went well etc etc so 10 x 40 = £400 > £130ish even if the game lasts 5 years well then that's a saving and if it goes bust well that's life.
No they said that the future DLC would be in seasons about every year and that they would be about £40 each and that lifetime would get you everything for the next ten years. (on the assumption obviously the project was still running)