For some reason I keep thinking about the disaster in Darfur.On Earth.
Thargoid Attacks: Where, When and What you can do about it
- Thread starter Factabulous
- Start date
Can confirm - both starports saved (again!) this week
Whoop! I think... (where art thou 3.1?)
Congrats all round.
Two weeks in a row so far.
Two weeks in a row so far.
New targets reported in the usual thread - but here they are : Lalande 4141 and Lwalama, no NHSS yet though, ticket raised with FD https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/427738-Eagle-Eye-target-Lalande-4141-has-no-NHSS
Lalande 4141 and Lwalama now both have NHSS, so fill yr boots!
Note that one is Empire, and one Federation...
Just be aware that there seem to be people intent on PROTECTING the Thargoids, got interdicted by an annoying FDL of Cmdr Truffle Shuffle, next time he'll be KOS
I believe he's been doing that for a while - time to test all those PvPer who all calling for Open Only and call on them for help - will be a good test of how well that's gonna work out
* Not sure if this counts as name & shame, as he has no shame
They're not running - reading too many books has caused you to get confused
They're clearly searching for something, if they are running then why visit INRA bases, why attack capital ships, why even attack starports? Anyway, this thread isn't really for lorebore, back to the hunting & killing
They're not running - reading too many books has caused you to get confused
They're clearly searching for something, if they are running then why visit INRA bases, why attack capital ships, why even attack starports? Anyway, this thread isn't really for lorebore, back to the hunting & killing
That and the source of said lore could have gotten it wrong or lied.
Traffic reports show we should support Lwalama more:
EDMC data says the opposite:
Traffic has more predictive power - but you also have the choice between protecting an Imperial or a Federation system this week.
Predictions are that we will lose both systems, Lwalama is most at risk. But it is early in the week, so things will improve
EDMC data says the opposite:
Traffic has more predictive power - but you also have the choice between protecting an Imperial or a Federation system this week.
Predictions are that we will lose both systems, Lwalama is most at risk. But it is early in the week, so things will improve
How are the predictions assessing each system's chances? Since the number of kills in each system is getting logged by a sample of the population, then can you use the traffic records of each system to work out the size of this sample as a proportion of the traffic reported in-game, and thus estimate the total number of kills in systems that were saved?
.
I'll be heading off on the Small Worlds Expedition 3 in just over a week, so I'll try and give one of these systems a boost over the next few days.
.
I'll be heading off on the Small Worlds Expedition 3 in just over a week, so I'll try and give one of these systems a boost over the next few days.
Nothing that complicated
My predictions are based purely on (number of fighting ships in a system) * (number of days they are seen).
If we get more than around 70 ships / day then we win, otherwise we lose. Hasn't failed yet. KISS
As you say, the EDMC reports are based on a very small sample, so while they are fun I ignore them - they've often been wrong. If we get a better take-up of EDMC they may become accurate, so they're worth tracking (but mainly so we can test them).
USS survey results
Hi, it this working well? Last data I have from May 11.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10SwarpGE6208lY0GpvSZogdk8s0m0bQXoZlZCWkDe1w/edit#gid=518604977
Edit: can you add this doc on the first page or where we can find it originally
Hi, it this working well? Last data I have from May 11.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10SwarpGE6208lY0GpvSZogdk8s0m0bQXoZlZCWkDe1w/edit#gid=518604977
Edit: can you add this doc on the first page or where we can find it originally
Last edited:
Please tell me where this Cmdr is or where he was seen the last time!