Sorry, I just popped into this thread out of curiosity, and now I can only wonder...
Ye gods, why are we hunting the poor Notre Dame?!
Ye gods, why are we hunting the poor Notre Dame?!
Yes the subject is "Notre Dame" and not Amazon who is not a model of exemplarity concerning the treatment of its employees, and which represents nothing in terms of the history of the humanity and the human values, and for whom no one will remember when it will disappears, just as its creator.Sorry, I just popped into this thread out of curiosity, and now I can only wonder...
Ye gods, why are we hunting the poor Notre Dame?!
Yes, let’s us get back to the topic, The Burning of ND in Paris, or I’m afraid the tread will be closed.Yes the subject is "Notre Dame" and not Amazon who is not a model of exemplarity concerning the treatment of its employees, and which represents nothing in terms of the history of the humanity and the human values, and for whom no one will remember when it will disappears, just as its creator.
So they're expecting Europeans to contribute tax money to rebuild a folly they'll never visit. Whilst disrespecting European culture and the concept of spending tax money to help other people?
This seems questionable, published data indicates 13 million per year. Germany's Romantic Road logs 25 million per year.Notre Dame of Paris is the most visited monument, not just in France, but of EUROPE. Yes even more than the Eiffel tower.
No that is true, however demolishing the buildings is not the solution, our boxed constructions today are boring and will not last a 100 years, that actually will tell you something about the quality of these buildings.That applies to whole of Europe and includes entire cities. However we cannot live in a museum.
Speaking for myself, the issue has been the sentiment in this thread that there is something wrong with wealthy individuals donating large sums of their own money to the restoration project. I've made that very clear.So they're expecting Europeans to contribute tax money to rebuild a folly they'll never visit. Whilst disrespecting European culture and the concept of spending tax money to help other people?
Certainly the post war stuff is a bit ****.No that is true, however demolishing the buildings is not the solution, our boxed constructions today are boring and will not last a 100 years, that actually will tell you something about the quality of these buildings.
These seem like fair positions.Certainly the post war stuff is a bit ****.
My objections are;
1) Mature Oak forest shouldn't be felled for the roof. (environmentalism)
2) Tax funds shouldn't be used to pay for it. (separation of church & state)
as i wrote before, they can use engineered wood, it is just as good and maybe better, and you don't need to cut any trees for that.Worryingly it looks like Groupama has other ideas...
They're offering 1300 100 year old oak trees from Normandy.
Worryingly it looks like Groupama has other ideas...
They're offering 1300 100 year old oak trees from Normandy.
Hopefully it would be viewed as illegal under the EU Common Forestry Policy, and enforced with same rigour as the logging of Białowieża forest in Poland.