We lose a % of the game population. Because they might not be able to afford to pay to play.
And how many would you gain? Only FD have the numbers of pledges on each platform, and what sub they have.
We lose a % of the game population. Because they might not be able to afford to pay to play.
ppfff.... This one was not an emergency exit I am sorry.
What if at lowest settings I cannot run the game? I go to a forum and complain?
Why not just remove open, then everyone wins.How about a compromise where everyone gets to stay in PP regardless of their gamemode, but open gains a huge bonus multiplier for all PP activities?
How about a compromise where everyone gets to stay in PP regardless of their gamemode, but open gains a huge bonus multiplier for all PP activities?
I don't use Discord so I don't know how it work out.That play in open and have no clue that this arguement is going on.
I accepted not playing Wing or CqC or open to play this game. To have something taken away would make this game sub Standard.So everyone else has to have a sub-standard game, or a game that can never change? Sometimes progress hurts. A fact I know as PC gaming can be expensive.
Remember Mac did that them self Not Frontier.Like I said, follow the money. Native Mac version did not make a lot of cash top earn its keep or be developed, so out comes the shotgun.
No, from the reaction on Sandros flash topic. Sad as I am I counted the lot, and from Obsidian Ants poll both were a hard majority Open only.
Why not just remove open, then everyone wins.
Weighted Merits have been looked at, which attenuates PG AFK (away from keyboard) turretboating slightly- but only if solo and pg merits are reduced by about 95% value. Its only then that it sees an effect. I much prefer Open only, but if it was chosen its better than nothing.
So nothing changesYAY! Then we have 50 souless proto CGs each week!
Remember Mac did that them self Not Frontier.
Why should Open get a bonus at all?How about a compromise where everyone gets to stay in PP regardless of their gamemode, but open gains a huge bonus multiplier for all PP activities?
.... because not all players agree that such a change would constitute an improvement to their gameplay.Requirements can change. Graphical ones changed in the past after all. Why cannot mode availability change too.
A majority of a minority then? And again, what about those who do not want? Sucks to be them?
You have something, but we are taking it away to appease some other players.
If PP was a new feature, then it wouldn't really be the same, it could have been introduced as an open only feature with less objection (would still have been some of course).
The whole argument revolves around no caring about those who enjoy the feature from PG/solo, some which can't play in open, whether it be due to connectivity issues, finanances, or whatever.
Let's just imagine an arbritary situation, where FD said that the majority of PPers were playing in solo. And for some crazy reason decided they were going to remove it from open, because hardly anyone plays it in open anyway. Who cares about the minority eh?
I'm not saying its realistic, but just try putting the shoe on the other foot for a moment.
Why should Open get a bonus at all?
So nothing changes
There's no requirement to PvP to participate in normal gameplay in this game - never has been (apart from CQC/Arena, of course).To make people participate in player versus player for their pledged factions?
Why should Open get a bonus at all?
What right have you, I or anyone to make people do something they may not want to?To make people participate in player versus player for their pledged factions?
FPS does not stop players accessing game features.Also not all players accept DPS drop after deployment of graphical improvements and yet..