Fleet Carrier realism and cutural discourse
ED is dead, accodring to some pilots. However, certain other pilots use the advent of fleet carriers to denote not theory, as pretextual dialectic theory suggests, but posttheory. Thus, the meaninglessness, and therefore the failure, of the simulation of the galaxy, prevalent in the non-narrative of the game, is also evident in them, although in a more subtextual sense.
If one examines fleet carriers, one is faced with a choice: either accept dialectic postsemiotic theory or conclude that this game is fundamentally meaningless, but only if the premise of pretextual dialectic theory is valid; otherwise, they have intrinsic meaning. An abundance of discourses concerning fleet carriers may be revealed. However, pretextual dialectic theory holds that ED is capable of truth.
Try it for yourself.
I'm bored and I wanted to be featured in the fleet carriers thread thread. Thus I figured that it was time for a more serious discussion of this topic.
ED is dead, accodring to some pilots. However, certain other pilots use the advent of fleet carriers to denote not theory, as pretextual dialectic theory suggests, but posttheory. Thus, the meaninglessness, and therefore the failure, of the simulation of the galaxy, prevalent in the non-narrative of the game, is also evident in them, although in a more subtextual sense.
If one examines fleet carriers, one is faced with a choice: either accept dialectic postsemiotic theory or conclude that this game is fundamentally meaningless, but only if the premise of pretextual dialectic theory is valid; otherwise, they have intrinsic meaning. An abundance of discourses concerning fleet carriers may be revealed. However, pretextual dialectic theory holds that ED is capable of truth.
Try it for yourself.
I'm bored and I wanted to be featured in the fleet carriers thread thread. Thus I figured that it was time for a more serious discussion of this topic.