Another Fleet Carriers Thread

[Deleted member 110222]

Memes! Yay!

But seriously, do you think this is a proper takeaway on the "One carrier per instance" thing?

Carriers will not be present in supercruise bar nav-signals.

Carriers must be of a minimum distance from each other in normal space.

Pure speculation but that's how I'm reading it.

Please don't hate me @Factabulous for adding a notch to the bedpost.

 

[Speedcuffs]

Memes! Yay!

But seriously, do you think this is a proper takeaway on the "One carrier per instance" thing?

Carriers will not be present in supercruise bar nav-signals.

Carriers must be of a minimum distance from each other in normal space.

Pure speculation but that's how I'm reading it.

Please don't hate me @Factabulous for adding a notch to the bedpost.

This is how I'm reading it from currently available information.

 

[IndigoWyrd]

I’m just trying to wrap my head around what this discussion aims to accomplish.

 

[Factabulous]

This is how I'm reading it from currently available information.

You need to take the Thread Thread more seriously - posting in Threads before the Thread Thread should be a crime punishable by DEATH!

... maybe

 

[Gully Foyle]

I’m just trying to wrap my head around what this discussion aims to accomplish.

I think we are supposed to approve his take out?
approved.

 

[Nasc]

I'm speculating that fleet carriers will not be able to carry the volume necessary to house the fleet carrier threads.

 

[Factabulous]

Please don't hate me @Factabulous for adding a notch to the bedpost.

You are helping to get us to a glorious 200 FC threads - praise be to dog!

 

[Retropolitan]

You need to take the Thread Thread more seriously - posting in Threads before the Thread Thread should be a crime punishable by DEATH!

... maybe

Oh, I don't know. Since the fuel for Fleet Carrier Threads is only available in the Thread Thread I think this is a self-correcting problem.

 

[IndigoWyrd]

I think we are supposed to approve his take out?
approved.

Franz Ferdinand approves this post.

 

[GraphiteGB]

Carriers must be of a minimum distance from each other in normal space.

Rejected.. lol.

There will be no other carriers in normal space as they are going to be in the same exact space in the same location in the system but in another instance ...
Each instance is another single carrier...
If 700 people jump there carrier to Sol (servers will crash) there will be 700 semi perminant intances of sols FC jump in point created, 1 for each to so 700 peoples fleet carriers in that system...
You wont be able to access any FC you don't have permission to land on... IF you have permission to land on more than 1 there will be an selection process to switch instances... If You want to visit another FC youll have to select its instance to be able to land on it... If you wing up with a FC owner that groups leaders FC will be selected..
IMO

 

[IndigoWyrd]

Rejected.. lol.

There will be no other carriers in normal space as they are going to be in the same exact space in the same location in the system but in another instance ...
Each instance is another single carrier...
If 700 people jump there carrier to Sol (servers will crash) there will be 700 semi perminant intances of sols FC jump in point created, 1 for each to so 700 peoples fleet carriers in that system...
You wont be able to access any FC you don't have permission to land on... IF you have permission to land on more than 1 there will be an selection process to switch instances... If You want to visit another FC youll have to select its instance to be able to land on it... If you wing up with a FC owner that groups leaders FC will be selected..
IMO

“But we CAN ignore them!”

 

[TheSisko]

 

[Lightspeed]

I'm feeling very left out: I haven't started a Fleet Carriers thread

 

[Gully Foyle]

You are helping to get us to a glorious 200 FC threads - praise be to dog!

View attachment 142695

That's a beauty.

 

[Gully Foyle]

I'm feeling very left out: I haven't started a Fleet Carriers thread

You can do it Light! think of one!

 

[CMDR CPT. Boris]

Rejected.. lol.

There will be no other carriers in normal space as they are going to be in the same exact space in the same location in the system but in another instance ...
Each instance is another single carrier...
If 700 people jump there carrier to Sol (servers will crash) there will be 700 semi perminant intances of sols FC jump in point created, 1 for each to so 700 peoples fleet carriers in that system...
You wont be able to access any FC you don't have permission to land on... IF you have permission to land on more than 1 there will be an selection process to switch instances... If You want to visit another FC youll have to select its instance to be able to land on it... If you wing up with a FC owner that groups leaders FC will be selected..
IMO

maybe we'll have to lock on some carrier nav beacon thing

 

[M0rty]

 

[TheSisko]

I'm feeling very left out: I haven't started a Fleet Carriers thread

You've got until December, plenty of time Commander.

 

[GraphiteGB]

maybe we'll have to lock on some carrier nav beacon thing

Then use the sub target selection to switch to each instance were a carrier we have acccess to will be listed by owner and modules type...
To simple for fdev so it won't be that...

 

[fu9ar]

That is my expectation. They will show up like megaships in a system.