I've read it twice and I still don't know whether you agree or disagree with me.If you want a company to change, you vote with your wallet. I seriously don't understand why this isnt more widely understood. If everyone was to stop buying anything thats released in a broken buggy mess or straight up ignored the AAA release roster game devs would actually make whole games again, but everyone is now so used to this "Day one patch" concept that they buy in with the thought that it will get better in time. Which it seldom ever does. Boycotting them isnt exactly an issue is it? Moreover I couldnt care less if their bottom line starts suffering because people stop buying thier reproccesed tripe year in year out. Sports games being the most cancerous example.
The dev's themselves shouldnt be made to go without paychecks sure, but quite frankly if youre going to sell your soul to a company like that, I don't really give one single toss wether or not they get paid. Not one single iota.
Take the new COD for example, seemingly it has breathed new life into the franchise and most ont seem to have a bad word to say about it. Do I like shooters? Yes. Will I buy it? Not on your life because the company that made it has a hideous history of trying to sap every single penny out of thier playerbase and then asking for more.
Though Ea are certainly not the top of the dirt pile this year, they have been so anti consumer and so unbeleiveably greedy these last few years that a few months where Blizzard for example, look worse, does not absolve them from ten years of taking the buiscuit out of thier players and customers.
Lastly, young though I might be, I still remember a time where if a development team released a broken product that was buggy or in some cases totally non functional, thier product bombed and so did the company. "But we can fix it laaaaterrrr" is the single most retaded excuse there ever was for releasing a game in a broken state. It's not justifyable not is it consumer friendly. Again. Money first, customer statisfaction second. Any company that trends to that gets nothing off me.
"Vote with your wallet" is exactly what I meant.
TL/DR: If the Fallen order turns out to be a good game, I say it's stupid to not buy it just because EA released a ton of crappy products in the past. That way nobody learns anything.
Naturally you are still free to not buy it. It's your money. I just think that the "EA bad" argument is not helpful at all.