i can still buy the apple.. whats your point?...and in ED you can swap 1 apple for 9 blackberries.
i can still buy the apple.. whats your point?...and in ED you can swap 1 apple for 9 blackberries.
Someone still has to manually pick the apple.i can still buy the apple.. whats your point?
Right, an here comes the marketplace again. ATM in ED theres no way a "farmer" can grind his apples and sell them to ppl that want the apple to trade for blackberries..Someone still has to manually pick the apple.
Saying you can buy an apple from a shop is more inline with discussing if you should be able to buy mats with credits, rather than discussing the "grind" of manually picking mats.
At the end of the day this is definitely a topic where people are going to sit on their side of the fence and I don't think either side can be swayed from their position.
Some people think it's grindy, some don't. Some people like Marmite, but marmite haters are not going to convince marmite lovers that they should start hating it.
...and in ED you can swap 1 apple for 9 blackberries.
Yes but if they made the game world as inconsistent and illogical as Earth in the 21st century who would play.So we live in a world where its possible to fly faster than light but not to collect minerals in an efficient large scaled way. Gotcha.
Someone still has to manually pick the apple.
Saying you can buy an apple from a shop is more inline with discussing if you should be able to buy mats with credits, rather than discussing the "grind" of manually picking mats.
At the end of the day this is definitely a topic where people are going to sit on their side of the fence and I don't think either side can be swayed from their position.
Some people think it's grindy, some don't. Some people like Marmite, but marmite haters are not going to convince marmite lovers that they should start hating it.
In ED you actually swap 30 apples for one blackberry with the MT
I dont know how anyone cant like this..
The problem is that i don't want anything removed. I want things to be improved and diversified. Which you are apparently against. So where is the reason to be against progress. Everyone likes new content. No one says don't add things to the game. So why are you against getting more tools for the job at hand. Why not get different srv, srv equipment. Anything that helps?
The same people that say it is not necessary and that they don't do it are the same people that want the thing to stay like it is. It makes no sense.
Someone didn't follow the discussion.
Not heard of that one, I've planted a Merton Thornless - good size and croppage but disappointing taste.The blackberry is a metaphor.
Seems like you want others to go through the same stuff.Because not everyone finds it such a hardship? I’m not denying that some do, but you can’t state an opinion as fact and tell anyone who feels contrary that they’re wrong and expect the conversation to go well...
those who dont find it a hardship have no loss tho. infact they can a gain a big plus makin credits as well that way...
Variety!!! Dont be stuck in the past
I gave a solution to this thread. Thats more than uve done hereSo what you’re looking for, is not discussion, but agreement?
What does and does not change, while subject to the whims of the community to an extent, is ultimately a decision for the devs. If they don’t want to include a player driven market (at this point we don’t know if they are planning to or not with Odyssey) then the game won’t. Shouting at people to agree with you on here won’t change that fact.
Actually lots of people have said don’t add new things to the game, Fleet Carriers being just one example.The problem is that i don't want anything removed. I want things to be improved and diversified. Which you are apparently against. So where is the reason to be against progress. Everyone likes new content. No one says don't add things to the game. So why are you against getting more tools for the job at hand. Why not get different srv, srv equipment. Anything that helps?
The same people that say it is not necessary and that they don't do it are the same people that want the thing to stay like it is. It makes no sense.
Someone didn't follow the discussion.
I gave a solution to this thread. Thats more than uve done here
im not shouting, im typing. also im not looking for any agreement but old geezers bein salty and scared of changes
PS: if i was looking for agreement id go to Reddit or Discord
FC carriers already allow this. invalid argumentYour solution isn’t one that is necessarily the best, or the only one, regardless of what you may think of it. Player-driven markets are open to the exploits of real-world cash money changing hands for in-game goods, which I and I suspect the devs may think is A Bad Thing.
FC carriers already allow this. invalid argument
you dont even have any solution or anything really to say aside "I dOnT lIkE cHaNgEs"So your solution is to make it worse? Equally fantastic argument there...
Well, it wouldn't take me very long... So absolute truth thereNow go engineer your ship to maximum, won't take long, honest!
Oh yes, we do! 7 Billion profit in 6 days... and no asteroids were involvedAnd dont start with abuse of anything.. we have FCs now