Bet they wish they had built there own engine though.
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
After all this years I think so.
That's because they have a thing called common sense, and want to release a product.
Yeah you’re right, it probably was easier for FDev when they did it.
(They barely banged on about it at all...)
That was about it, wasn't it? Plus the usual "stuff removed"... https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/spectrum-dispatch/18054-Roadmap-Roundup-April-7-2021
So .. server meshing (which we already knew was supposed to be in progress) and a vehicle that people have been talking about iirc. I think the website that reported big things were due were scammed 
How can that be persistent?????
lol modern parenting tch! If she mugs me when Im old and grey Ill know who to blame
from the RoadMap RoadMap:
As a final note, you’re probably wondering when we’ll be updating the roadmap to show additional quarters in the Release View.
Yes I have been wondering when they would extend the timeline again, at least now I know
Last edited:
How considerate of them to identify points of interest within the roadmap out of concern for backers' time, but what are the priorities among the teams themselves exactly? Seems to be missing the point of a roadmap, unless that is what the internal roadmap is for.
It would be illegal for them to sell something they don't own.
Not sure what you are asking here, but had a giggle at:
Does CIG have to try and make everything sound like some sort of massive achievement using some tech they created themselves?
I mean, enemies having loot and being able to sell that loot to shopkeepers has been a staple of games for decades, and not once did any of those developers say "using out BUILDING BLOCK TECHHHHH!!!!!"
The point of CIG's roadmap is to generate hype and therefore revenue. Its not there to provide things like.... oh, i don't know, some sort of release date.
Apparently backers are getting excited about clouds now.
Umm... Mr. Parry? Mr. Ben Parry? Who said he was leaving CIG some months ago?
Umm... Mr. Parry? Mr. Ben Parry? Who said he was leaving CIG some months ago?
Latest SQ42 update is out
Anyone wanting to know why a game that was apparently almost ready for release in 2014, repeatedly told to backers it would release in 2015, is still in development 6 years after, well, this is one of the reasons right here.
But just read the whole thing. SQ42 is clearly still a long way off from release.
How anyone can believe that CR wasn't lying through their teeth in 2014 needs their head checking.
Anyone wanting to know why a game that was apparently almost ready for release in 2014, repeatedly told to backers it would release in 2015, is still in development 6 years after, well, this is one of the reasons right here.
But just read the whole thing. SQ42 is clearly still a long way off from release.
How anyone can believe that CR wasn't lying through their teeth in 2014 needs their head checking.
I think they legally can now if they want.It would be illegal for them to sell something they don't own.
Since the end of the Crytek suit, they own the initial version of Cryengine they used. They could revert to it from Lumberyard as, for what I know, they don't use what has been developped by Amazon.
Last edited:
![[VR] DDM_Reaper20](https://d2aefvhu2f0gi9.cloudfront.net/data/avatars/m/44/44021.jpg?1588332101){kind=avatar}
You barely skimmed over my post in your desire to dismantle my point. Were this an exam, you'd have flunked it, with flying colour and a running start, no less. a) I wasn't saying CRobberts is a crook (way in over his head, I stated, and I stand by that, given the incessant scope creep and his inability to commit himself). b) I refer you, AGAIN, to Juergen Schneider. HE spent money. Lots of it. OBVIOUSLY. As any successful swindler will tell you: the most important thing is to string the punters along. You don't do that by grabbing at pennies and making a run for it.
That's not quite how it works...they were merely forced into purchasing a licence to use and develop the software they had already been using for several years, they didn't buy the company that still owns and licenses it
Last edited: