"I have stable 0.005 fps everywhere, it's fine" posts incoming.
Update 2 Feedback - Performance, Lighting, Bloom, Textures, Visors
- Thread starter BlackMaze
- Start date
"I have stable 0.005 fps everywhere, it's fine" posts incoming.
I have a feeling, they can't even if they wanted to.
Of course they can,
the question is what went wrong and on what stage,
ergo
how much of the new, changed graphical engine
must be scraped
and rewritten.
It's not rocket science, barely an economical dilemma
There are moments in software development you have to accept that the bite you took was a bit to big to chew and gulp down.Of course they can,
the question is what went wrong and on what stage,
ergo
how much of the new, changed graphical engine
must be scraped
and rewritten.
It's not rocket science, barely an economical dilemma
And to be frank: Rocket Science is exactly what building a good and future proof 3D engine is. That's not something without experience gobbles together from the units asset store.
I try to keep the hopes up, sure, i have nothing to loose if I do but I'm a realist too.
No, i don't scream DOOOOOOOOM!
I may have something else on my mind when I am referring to "rocket science."
I associate this subject with being pioneers in some very difficult scientific area.
You know, "race to the moon" and similar references
Therefore writing a 3D engine is not RS in MY dictionary, because it's being done on regular basis all over the world successfully
OK, that much OT is enough.
If the goal's to have things looking realistic the console and cockpit lighting (even though there often isn't much) isn't ever going to let your eyes get dark-adapted enough to see more stars than you can currently see. Look out of the window from even a dimly-lit room. You'd need to turn them all off, and not be pointed at a nearby star or planet. Which I'd like to be an option (or even have it be somewhat dependent on the brightness selected for the console). Even then it shouldn't be anywhere near as bright as it was; people have exaggerated views of what space looks like, based on long-exposure photographs. The Milky Way, from a dark location with dark-adapted eyes is still quite faint, a beautiful faintly glowing band across the sky, and there are countless dim stars everywhere. A little bit of light from something else in your vision reduces that effect significantly. It would also be nice if pretty vs realistic skybox colouring and brightness was an option but I very much doubt that'll ever be a choice.
There used to be a "see more as you get further out" adjustment. Pity it went.
So you're saying things are going smoothly.Visualization of FD's progress on fixing EDO:
Sorry but your association on this subject is just totally wrong.I may have something else on my mind when I am referring to "rocket science."
I associate this subject with being pioneers in some very difficult scientific area.
You know, "race to the moon" and similar references
Therefore writing a 3D engine is not RS in MY dictionary, because it's being done on regular basis all over the world successfully
OK, that much OT is enough.
Also, rockets are being made on regular basis all over the world, successfully...
Sorry but your association on this subject is just totally wrong.
Also, rockets are being made on regular basis all over the world, successfully...
EDH and EDO is still using DirectX 11 API and unfortunately that alone is a very limiting factor for performance. However I think they actually have a CPU/thread problem and not a graphical limitation.
Constant proregress.So you're saying things are going smoothly.
CZ hit me the hardest
Attachments
It's even more bizarre
when you actually monitor all of your hardware
and NONE of components is 100% utilized
but you still get 35-40 fps instead of usual 60.
And I think I didn't know how high my fans in my system could spin until Odyssey.
It's like gaming rig was preparing for hyperjump FC style.
CZs definitely have a serious CPU problem, that was "easy" to identify:
FPS at 50 but CPU at ~53% and GPU at ~75%
Something in today’s hot fix broke performance again? I should have taken my own advice and left it alone. My post isn't related to today's hotfix.
FPS at 50 but CPU at ~53% and GPU at ~75%
Interesting. I have a 3700x, RTX 2070 Super 16GB RAM, My CPU is at roughly 30% and GPU roughly at 75% even when FPS is down to 40. Interesting, I'm experiencing the same thing in Horizons lately, although not everywhere (only in rings - did not try planetary surfaces) and not to that extent...
Good thing, that if I'm right then it should be "easy" to optimize.
Might be, but I fear my neighbors don't approve of that