And don't forget that Lord Brebus himself plays Odyssey on Ultra on a 980...That's the thing, a 980 is about the same as a 1060 in most games and benchmarks, and a 1060 is 'recommended' for 1080 gaming according to the listed Odyssey specs.
And don't forget that Lord Brebus himself plays Odyssey on Ultra on a 980...That's the thing, a 980 is about the same as a 1060 in most games and benchmarks, and a 1060 is 'recommended' for 1080 gaming according to the listed Odyssey specs.
Thanks! If you don't mind, what's your on foot settlement FPS in Odyssey at 1080p?
Hey @BL1P - I've done a little digging, and I've seen 3060 scores coming in at the 4000s on Heaven - Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/k7ybz1/rtx_3060_ti_heaven_benchmark/Runs Total WarWarhammer II scaven benchmark on Ultra settings with an average of 90-100fps which is v good for the card.
Unity Heaven Benchmark seems good for a none OCed benchmark rig.
View attachment 246552
Cpu seems to be running vgood as expected on all cpu heavy games I have tried.
To be honest its that new of a PC I have only really had time to Install some games and to play Elite.
I ran some total war warhammer benchmarks as they stress the CPU when you run them on ultra and I wanted to test that.
I got the Heaven benchmark after the 4fps on foot fiasco in Elite.
Results seem fine for Heaven at Ultra Ultra (I think) for a 3060 non TI
As Elite is my favourite game I was quite upset at the results I got at a settlement. (<--- Massive understatement )![]()
249 jumps out of the bubble, heading back from Colonia but slowly, averaging about 10-15 jumps a night.Thanks! If you don't mind, what's your on foot settlement FPS in Odyssey at 1080p?
HAHA! so, not for awhile then249 jumps out of the bubble, heading back from Colonia but slowly, averaging about 10-15 jumps a night.
What about using the training mission as a benchmark. That way its accessible to all and consistent?HAHA! so, not for awhile thenno worries! thanks for your help so far. I'm not expecting a massive break through here, but if we can get some idea why Bl1ps performance is so poor compared to what should be expected that would be great.
Problem with <1.0 "super"sampling (effectively subsampling) is that what you get is actually not even 1440p anymore.So my native resolution is 3840x2160. Currently have to play down to 2560x1440 Just to stay above 30 FPS. I've messed around with all my settings and not much changes in FPS except when I mess around with Supersampling.
Supersampling x1.0
View attachment 246650
Supersampling x0.85
View attachment 246651
Supersampling x0.75
View attachment 246652
Supersampling x0.65
View attachment 246653
So realistically, I should stay at around x0.85 - x0.75 which have the most notable improvements in FPS. But if it's visible via the screenshots, things start looking pretty grainy after 0.85. The lettering around the SRV hud start losing sharpness and become noticeably more noisy. I want to keep it at x1.0 because it looks so smooth and I can noticeably tell the difference once I drop from x1.0 but damn. Even crazier as you can see from the Performance Overlay stats, my GPU utilization doesn't change at all. Something ain't right.
CMDR | CPU | GPU | RAM | OS | Resolution | Unigine Score | FPS |
BL1p | Ryzen 3700x | Nvidia 3060 RTX 12g | 32Gb | W10 | 1920 x 1080 | 2627 | <30 |
-VR- Max Factor | i5 8600 | Nvidia 2070 | 16Gb | >40 | |||
CMDR The Riz | i7-8750H | Nvidia 2070 | 32Gb | 1920 x 1080 | <40 (not ultra) | ||
FalconFly | Ryzen 3600 | AMD RX580 | 16Gb | 1920 x 1080 | <30 | ||
VR Lucian Arkright | Ryzen 3600 | Nvidia GTX 980 | 16Gb | W10 | 1920 x 1080 | 1578 | <30 |
MCCART | Ryzen 2600x | AMD RX5600XT | 32Gb | W10 | 1920 x 1080 | <30 | |
sede | i7-4771 | Nvidia GTX 780M | 709 | ||||
Athlon-uk | i7-10700k | Nvidia RTX 3070 | 1920 x 1080 | 4307 |
I've only got a 1080p screen to test with, so that should really be the lowest common denominator.
I'd suggest doing the run on Fullscreen Ultra preset to get a worst case scenario.
Those with higher panels a run at 1080 and native (4k panels could run at 1440 too, if you're up for it) would give good indicators too.
I've actually started collating into a Excel sheet (I might have had too much time on my hands...) so happy to update with more accurate figures, and I think it would also be interesting to see the difference higher end cards are achieving at higher resolutions.
CMDR CPU GPU RAM OS Resolution Unigine Score FPS BL1p Ryzen 3700x Nvidia 3060 RTX 12g 32Gb W10 1920 x 1080 2627<30 -VR- Max Factor i5 8600 Nvidia 2070 16Gb >40 CMDR The Riz i7-8750H Nvidia 2070 32Gb 1920 x 1080 <40 (not ultra) FalconFly Ryzen 3600 AMD RX580 16Gb 1920 x 1080 <30 VR Lucian Arkright Ryzen 3600 Nvidia GTX 980 16Gb W10 1920 x 1080 1578<30 MCCART Ryzen 2600x AMD RX5600XT 32Gb W10 1920 x 1080 <30 sede i7-4771 Nvidia GTX 780M 709Athlon-uk i7-10700k Nvidia RTX 3070 1920 x 1080 4307
I can see what I can do, hopefully tomorrow. I have a 1070ti, i7 7700k 4.2ghz, 16Gb ram. 1920X1080.Anybody else up for using the training mission as a benchmark? If so we would need to agree on a single graphic setup and resolution or the figures won't really mean anything. I know there are other posts on rig setups and fps but everyone is using a different area for there results, at least this would be consistent.
Cheers buddy!I can see what I can do, hopefully tomorrow. I have a 1070ti, i7 7700k 4.2ghz, 16Gb ram. 1920X1080.
I'll note, however that when I did the tutorial, with Horizon's release, I don't remember having performance issue. It came later on during "regular" gameplay.
Thanks!
Might be easier on you, thread-wise, to use google sheets or similar (OneDrive) and post a link to it. You should be able to copy/paste your existing data to it.Cheers buddy!
Thanks!