More Likes Relationships

[VSSEMike]

Nodosaurs did actually coexist with stegosaurs. There are two nodosaurs from the Morrison Formation where Stegosaurus was found: Mymoorapelta and Gargoyleosaurus.

I did not know there are nodosaurs discovered in the Morrison Formation.

I wonder if anybody remembers in the third Jurassic Park film, Stegosaurus and Ankylosaurus have no issue with one another in the "Brachiosaurus on the Bank" scene. Same thing happens in Camp Cretaceous.

 

[luispaistallon]

Yes i remember that scene jp 3 and the episode 1 of camp cretaceous, but i think Frontier did great think making ceratopsid and Ankylosaurid disliking stegosaurid. If not, the game whould have been more easy.


I think that this are the cohabit changes that should be implemented in the next uptades.

• Triceratops x Torosaurus.
• Pachycepalosaurus x Stygymoloch x Dracorex(Due to the theory that can be the same animal in different stage of their life)
• Corythosaurus x Parasaurolophus (Like JPIII).
• Therizinosaurus x Homalocephale(they live in the same place and both are from the late cretaceous)
• Pteranodon x Geostenbergia( If Geostenbergia likes Pteranodon, Pteranodon should like Geostenbergia)
• Hybrid shouldn´t like another member of the same species( In the case that Spinoceratops is implemented in the future, only the carnivores should hate another member of the same species)

- Also i think ceratopsid should like another kind of dinosaur( Hadrosaurid or Sauropid, have more chance the hadrosaurid)

Another think Frontier should do is delete the data of edmontosaurus and archeonotomimus liking eatch other, due to hadrosaurid likes ornithopod with the last uptade.

 

[JWIIIfan]

I would like to see more interactions between small carnivores and large herbivores and between small carnivores and large carnivores, like compy + everything and velociraptor + indominus. That’s the most restrictive part of cohabitation left after the last update.

For example:

• coelophysis + sauropods
• coelophysis + large carnivores

 

[VSSEMike]

I would like to see more interactions between small carnivores and large herbivores and between small carnivores and large carnivores, like compy + everything and velociraptor + indominus. That’s the most restrictive part of cohabitation left after the last update.

For example:

• coelophysis + sauropods
• coelophysis + large carnivores

Would Coelophysis be prey to large carnivores?

If Apatosaurus, Diplodocus, and Mamenchisaurus could fight in this game; they might kill Coelophysis out of their dislike towards carnivores.

 

[JurWrldEvolu]

All I can think of to ask for is:

• Diplodocus and Brachiosaurus
• Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus
• Camarasaurus and Diplodocus

 

[VSSEMike]

All I can think of to ask for is:

• Diplodocus and Brachiosaurus
• Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus
• Camarasaurus and Diplodocus

Good thinking. In Update 3, Frontier made Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus like Brachiosaurus. As they did so, they forgotten to make Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus like each other.

 

[JWIIIfan]

Triceratops x Torosaurus.

This needs to be implemented. Ceratopsians are the hardest to build diverse enclosures for because they only like ankylosaurs so I don’t think this change would make building enclosures too easy. Torosaurus, Triceratops, and Sinoceratops are also too similar to each other (they have the same likes, dislikes, and food preferences) and this would make the 3 of them unique.

I think Wuerhosaurus and Pentaceratops should be neutral to carnivores instead of dislike them too. Wuerhosaurus and Stegasaurus have the same likes and food preferences, and Pentaceratops and Nasutoceratops too. Having different preferences for carnivores would separate these species.

• Good thinking. In Update 3, Frontier made Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus like Brachiosaurus. As they did so, they forgotten to make Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus like each other.

This might be intentional. Gigantspinosaurus likes Huayangasaurus and Chungkingosaurus but they don’t like each other. Allosaurus likes Ceratosaurs and Metriacanthosaurus but they don’t like each other either.

Would Coelophysis be prey to large carnivores?

It’s not that much bigger than compsognathus, which is fine in an enclosure with large carnivores. Compys are very good at keeping out of the way of large predators and don’t get caught. Coelophysis would get eaten by the tougher small carnivores like velociraptors but I don’t see why it would have any problems with large carnivores when compys don’t.

 

[JurWrldEvolu]

Good thinking. In Update 3, Frontier made Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus like Brachiosaurus. As they did so, they forgotten to make Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus like each other.

Also forgot to make Diplodocus like the other three

 

[mistersiraj11]

Hi. Instead of asking for more like changes, why not implement a cohabitation genome editor? We can pick and choose, herbivores or carnivores alike, which species can cohabitate or not. What's that? It makes the game easy and boring? Well, certain maps (challenge mode and even some chaos theory) can have it disabled just to have the player think outside the box a bit. I hope Mr. Erik notices this comment (PS. Any info about the game's soundtrack release?)

 

[VSSEMike]

This needs to be implemented. Ceratopsians are the hardest to build diverse enclosures for because they only like ankylosaurs so I don’t think this change would make building enclosures too easy. Torosaurus, Triceratops, and Sinoceratops are also too similar to each other (they have the same likes, dislikes, and food preferences) and this would make the 3 of them unique.

I think Wuerhosaurus and Pentaceratops should be neutral to carnivores instead of dislike them too. Wuerhosaurus and Stegasaurus have the same likes and food preferences, and Pentaceratops and Nasutoceratops too. Having different preferences for carnivores would separate these species.

I have recently checked the requirements of Nasutoceratops, Pentaceratops, and Wuerhosaurus. It would be better if Nasutoceratops and Pentaceratops like each other because they require the Ground Leaf.

Wuerhosaurus and Stegosaurus should like each other because they require Ground Fiber and Ground Fruit.

Do anyone remember these from Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis?

In Jurassic World: Evolution 1, Kentrosaurus and Stegosaurus can be put together sharing the same paleo food.

In Jurassic World: Evolution 2, Kentrosaurus and Stegosaurus have the requirement of Ground Fiber. It seems unlikely due to their fossils were discovered in three different continents, but does anyone want these two stegosaurs to like each other?

 

[Dinoken]

Okay, why should certain theropod dinosaurs like Acrocanthosaurus & Carcharodontosaurus, or Albertosaurus & Qianzhousaurus be able to cohabitate together? As they didn't live together at the same time or place.

Albertosaurus was western North America, Qianzhousaurus was China, Carcharodontosaurus was in Africa, And Acrocanthosaurus was in western North America about 40 million years before Albertosaurus.

 

[VSSEMike]

Okay, why should certain theropod dinosaurs like Acrocanthosaurus & Carcharodontosaurus, or Albertosaurus & Qianzhousaurus be able to cohabitate together? As they didn't live together at the same time or place.

Albertosaurus was western North America, Qianzhousaurus was China, Carcharodontosaurus was in Africa, And Acrocanthosaurus was in western North America about 40 million years before Albertosaurus.

Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus belong to carchardontosaurid family scientifically speaking. Albertosaurus and Qianzhousaurus are medium-sized tyrannosaurs.

 

[Dinoken]

Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus belong to carchardontosaurid family scientifically speaking. Albertosaurus and Qianzhousaurus are medium-sized tyrannosaurs.

I know that - my point is just they are same kind of theropod dinosaurs does not mean that they should be able to live together in the same enclosure. In fact, they usually should not. As most theropods tend to see other species of their kind as rivals.

Cohabitation with similar species should be something which only the herbivore dinosaurs, pterosaurs or marine reptiles are capable of. For example - Tapejara should like Cearadactylus & Maaradactylus, because they were in the same formation. Pachycephalosaurs should like Ceratopsids, Ankylosaurids, & Hadrosaurids and vice versa, because of the same reasons.

 

[VSSEMike]

In Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis, Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus like each other because they are the same type of theropods.

It would be better if the same thing happens in Jurassic World: Evolution 2, and it should also extend to Albertosaurus and Qianzhousaurus. It would save space and make room for more dinosaurs.

It is agreeable that the pterosaurs in the Romualdo Formation should like each other.

Currently, Pachcephalosaurs are already liking ankylosaurs. It make sense that they should like ceratopsians, ornithomimids, and hadrosaurs. It is odd that they like stegosaurs.

 

[Gondwana]

JWE2 is not Jpog. And what's with this "species X and Y are found in the same formation Z, so they should like each other"? How does that even make sense?
That's like saying "lions and hyenas should like each other, since they are living in the same region at the same time".

 

[Dinoken]

True - JWE2 is easily 100 times better than JPOG ever was. So, JWE2's species compatibility should also be much better.

 

[VSSEMike]

JWE2 is not Jpog. And what's with this "species X and Y are found in the same formation Z, so they should like each other"? How does that even make sense?
That's like saying "lions and hyenas should like each other, since they are living in the same region at the same time".

Lions and hyenas are of different types scientifically. No one expects those two to like each other. Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis serves as a basis for the development of the Jurassic World: Evolution games.

In Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis, most fans and players find it odd to see Dilophosaurus and Velociraptor like each other even they are of different types.

In Jurassic World: Evolution 2, Ceratosaurus and Allosaurus are of different types. They like each other due to their fossil discovery is in Lourinha Formation in Portugal, Como Bluff in Wyoming, Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry in Utah, Garden Park and Morrison Formation in Colorado.

Majungasaurus and Carnotaurus like each other because they are abelisaurids. Why not do the same for Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus? Same for Albertosaurus, Qianzhousaurus, and Tarbosaurus (if it is added)?

True - JWE2 is easily 100 times better than JPOG ever was. So, JWE2's species compatibility should also be much better.

I find the sandbox gameplay of Jurassic World: Evolution 2 is becoming like Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis. I like the element of Jurassic World: Evolution 2 in which herbivores do not require feeders and the paleobotany makes the herbivore exhibits more authentic. In the non-sandbox gameplay, I find egg failures frustrating and I have to reload several times to get a full batch when I upgraded the hatchery with advanced equipment. Before the latest update, it is a nuisance when it comes to finding suitable scientists. I have to time at which point the park report comes up and save so that I have reload until I find the candidates suitable.

Speaking of compatibility, there is still room for improvement.

 

[KingPhantom]

dont add to many likes. its part of the game to have it a bit harder to mix dinosaurs.

i would love to put some of the same group in to one enclosure but this makes it easier with every added like. (in JPOG stego and kentro were friends)

i apprechiate the recent update with the ceratops because some of them lived during the same time and are close related. but carnivores should remain "solo-players"

btw: we need the ballon ride from JPOG! i LOVED that

 

[VSSEMike]

dont add to many likes. its part of the game to have it a bit harder to mix dinosaurs.

i would love to put some of the same group in to one enclosure but this makes it easier with every added like. (in JPOG stego and kentro were friends)

i apprechiate the recent update with the ceratops because some of them lived during the same time and are close related. but carnivores should remain "solo-players"

btw: we need the ballon ride from JPOG! i LOVED that

It is space-consuming to exhibit carnivores if they should remain "solo-players".

It would be better if there are likes relationships between certain species of carnivores:

• Acrocanthosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus
• Albertosaurus and Qianzhousaurus

To be honest, I have yet to try the Jurassic-difficulty challenge mode in Northwest U.S.A (that does not look big enough to exhibit a lot of carnivore species).

I am disappointed with the likes relationship between ceratopsians because Torosaurus and Triceratops should like each other.

According to my research; their fossil discoveries are in Laramie Formation in Colorado; Lance Formation in Wyoming; Hell Creek Formation covering Montana, North and South Dakota; Frenchman Formation in Saskatchewan; and Scollard Formation in Alberta.

The record of Torosaurus (Ornithischia: Ceratopsidae) in Canada and its taxonomic implications

Abstract. The horned dinosaur genus Torosaurus has a challenging history, relating both to its geographic distribution and taxonomy. Whereas Torosaurus has

academic.oup.com

 

[Gondwana]

What is really bugging me is the extreme attitude of Therizinosaurus. It's like one of the hyper aggressive hybrids. It doesn't make sense at all that it hates even very small species like Dryosaurus and Homalocephale.
This situation is comparable to a T. Rex hating a Compy, or a lion hating a mouse.

Please consider making the Therizinosaurus like/tolerate very small species like Dryosaurus, Homalocephale, and Compsognathus. It's fine if it hates everything else, but it just doesn't make sense for it to actively hate the tiny ones for said reasons.