Thats interesting - do you have a link for that, because I've missed the message where they say that?
Thanks
2.3 dev update feedback mega thread
- Thread starter Jenner
- Start date
- Status
Thats interesting - do you have a link for that, because I've missed the message where they say that?
Thanks
Thats interesting - do you have a link for that, because I've missed the message where they say that?
Thanks
Just check my vote how many peoples are disappointed about Multicrew concpet: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showt...u-happy-with-how-Frontier-develop-Elite/page2
I'm certainly still waiting (occasionally impatiently) for the development of the existing features.
Though fresh features are great, and will attract new revenue/bring some players back, I'm still waiting for the additional SRVs that were talked about upon Horizons' release. Also waiting for expansion/development of the other features. Wing missions, for example. Naval careers. Ship naming. Orrery view. Asteroid bases... (or maybe I won't be waiting all that long for those particular things...)
Not a complaint per se, just an observation at this point - I still play and enjoy the game, but I can still hear the interviews where the expansion of these features was talked about. Perhaps I should get that seen to...
Does this count as 2.3 feedback if I really really really eeeeeeeeeeeally hope that the above make it into the release?
That's it? 163 are unhappy with the concept? Out of about 1.5 million game owners?
I though he was refering to some message from FD! Not a massive volume of FUD from 163 people.
Still these are statistics... Maybe it is quite small sample that it still present some layout of satisfied/dissatisfied players, deal with it.
I think 2.3 is much more fundamental than that, and that it shows ambition for space legs. eg. in 2.3 your avatar can be tagged as being outside your ship (at a given multicrew seat, button, switch, data download, punch someone in the face) as well as at 'some three dimensional place' outside that other ship (in fighter). None of the updates should be taken purely at face value I think, and I also think meeting a shady blackmarket contact 'in person' is more fun than accessing even a fleshed out blackmarket system only from the station services menu.
Last edited:
Aye I do too, but I still hope 2.3 has a bit more and I'm sure it will than what we have to chew on thus far.
"He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster.
And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee."
Aye I do too, but I still hope 2.3 has a bit more and I'm sure it will than what we have to chew on thus far.
I agree with you, and it may be that Frontier consider adding some features they know for a fact will end up redundant later. Whether that (knowingly wasted resources) is worth it, might depend on how restless the natives get .. but having watched the development from pre-release, and having had my epiphany around about 1.3, I definitely wouldn't be one to see any feature that comes, in any update, as the summary of Frontier's vision for the game. A vision of the code, for the game perhaps ..
ps. Death Lives! (Drokk!)
Last edited:
Nail on head. Without more robust multt-crew mechanics, it's just not worth anything but instant transfer.
I think how they react to our complains... I mean devs.
Are they sad? Or maybe angry? Or maybe they don't care? Maybe they are motivated to improve this game according to community request?
I'd say wait until after release and run the poll again, see how it measures up.
Just grabbed this pic from my secret camera hidden in FD's office. Here we see Braben reading the forums.
Erm, you know you return to your previous location once the multicrew session ends right?
And then run this poll again six weeks after release. These things should be judged by the longevity, i am looking at you CQC&PP.
Thats interesting - do you have a link for that, because I've missed the message where they say that?
Thanks
Numerous polls have come to this conclusion. between 70 to 85% of the people poled respond that NPC crew would be a better feature.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes I do know that.
Yes - I've been linked one of those polls.
163 people are unhappy with the Concept. Zero people have any experience with it.
So you are projecting your expectations onto FD wihout any actual feedback from them. Thats what it looks like right now from what you've said.
I just can't help thinking how he seems to be drinking from thee distinctively labeled mugs. As if he's trying to please three ideologically different player groups at the same time....
Frontier gave quite detailed description of Multicrew, me might be disappointed. It is sad for us because the works on multicrew are in advanced state and I don't think they will adjust to feedback. Maybe in future major patches, but I am not sure about that looking and PP and CQC. They policy clearly state: deploy half backed feature and leave it be.
- Status