For those who don't like the thought of the telepresence to join up with others across the galaxy, couldn't you just agree to meet at a certain station before instigating it?
Or am I missing something here?
I agree!
First of all, I am very critical with FD in the forums, so I think I should say that I really appreciate the return of the Dev Updates. It is very welcomed!
That being said...
Multicrew is a purely social addition to the game (given the lack of NPC crew). We often criticize that the galaxy feels empty, multicrew is a way to fix that. This feature is better made easy to access, for the sake of promoting player interaction and, well, fun. Whenever I want to play with my brother I want that easy to happen. Just consider two players login in after work, with not so much time to play, and being forced to spend "inmersive" amounts of times prior to actually playing together. For this time, I think the inmersion players (and I count myself among them) should make an exception. If we want realism, we can playrole it ourselves. It would be nice to have a "manual" way to access multicrew incorporated in-game, in which we have to travel and meet before boarding another ship. But it is important also to have a fast access to it too, in order to promote a feature that otherwise wouldn't be used as much.
The potential of multicrew is huge. However, I am disappointed though that nothing was mentioned about using one or two SRVs with a crew, nor about sharing missions with a crew. We share bounties, thats nice, but what about mission rewards? Why not make it so we can do base assaults together, in such a way that raids on planetary stations with different configurations of SRV, SLF and ships could be experimented? Moreover, why is it just combat? What if I want to multicrew to just fool around on planet surfaces with the SRVs? I mean, we can carry two! so why not letting our two crewmembers use them? Poor SRV, the forgotten hero of Horizons.
Anyway, it is likely they have already implemented this, since the mechanics are basically the same as with the SLF. But I cant help but wonder why was this omitted if so.