A POTENTIAL LEAD (Message from Professor Alba Tesreau, former Head of Research of Aegis)

i dropped into a signal source at the system.
it had a beacon and i´ve got this (german with my best translation) message after i scanned it:



Screenshot_0253.jpg

Outdated Firmware-Data

[Firmware-Installationpacket]

Please notice, this version is only supported as a legacy branch.
 
Last edited:
They gave every one till monday to find it out by them selves before spoiler-ing it via galnet which youll see as soon as you boot the game now..
 
The sad thing about these logs are that they have no context of why they were made.

I mean, who is he speaking to? Is he sending these to the Azimuth headquarters? Is it a personal log? Then why is he introducing him self in the first log? Is it for someone in INRA? That would be like confessing his crime.

My thought is that these are created for the sake of telling the story. He's not talking to anyone in his world. He's just talking to us, the players. It's like one of a caractor in a movie talking to the audience acknoledging the camera that shouldn't be in his world.
 
The sad thing about these logs are that they have no context of why they were made.

I mean, who is he speaking to? Is he sending these to the Azimuth headquarters? Is it a personal log? Then why is he introducing him self in the first log? Is it for someone in INRA? That would be like confessing his crime.

My thought is that these are created for the sake of telling the story. He's not talking to anyone in his world. He's just talking to us, the players. It's like one of a caractor in a movie talking to the audience acknoledging the camera that shouldn't be in his world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief?wprov=sfla1

Did you never watch a movie where one of the figures faces the camera and creates a vlog or some journal entries just to deliver exposition?
 
In HIP 22460 Planet 10B shows 2 Thargoid, 1 Guardian Signal. But there are 2 Thargoid sites and megaship Overlook. It should be 2 Thargoid and 1 Human signal?
Is it bug? I flew over planet to find anything about Guardian signal, but nothing.
 
In HIP 22460 Planet 10B shows 2 Thargoid, 1 Guardian Signal. But there are 2 Thargoid sites and megaship Overlook. It should be 2 Thargoid and 1 Human signal?
Is it bug? I flew over planet to find anything about Guardian signal, but nothing.

Yes, the consensus is that the Guardian signal is the Overlook. Bug.
 
Though i do disagree with the general sentiment; you seem to be suggesting optional downloadable content somehow shouldn't contain content.
Don't know how you managed to read that into what I said. Content not containing content? No idea what that is supposed to mean, sounds like gibberish looking for an argument. All I said was putting in Odyssey only content that was directly related to this story would be cutting out the Horizons players who have been following events so far, and not very fair to them.

I'd be the first to say they haven't made the most out of the content they had already, and could have done much more with existing assets.
 
Interesting that the text log said "mothership" while the voice log said "hiveship".
Also I'm going to assume "long ship" is meant to be "lone ship" because it makes much more sense.
 
All I said was putting in Odyssey only content that was directly related to this story would be cutting out the Horizons players who have been following events so far, and not very fair to them.

I'd be the first to say they haven't made the most out of the content they had already, and could have done much more with existing assets.
It's counter productive to support 2 games.
A few month ago they made an announcment they will only make content for Odyssey in the future.
Not sure why people still clinging to Horizon, saving 2$ pr month would have netted you Odyssey by now with little effort, and you could have gone back to Horizon when ever you wanted. At this point it feels like people are just throwing tantrums.
 
It's counter productive to support 2 games.
A few month ago they made an announcment they will only make content for Odyssey in the future.
Not sure why people still clinging to Horizon, saving 2$ pr month would have netted you Odyssey by now with little effort, and you could have gone back to Horizon when ever you wanted. At this point it feels like people are just throwing tantrums.
Assuming they can run it, sure. I'm playing Odyssey so I'm not sure who you are aiming that at. To me the ones throwing tantrums are the ones saying get on with giving us more Odyssey content. I'm just speculating on reasons why they haven't yet, specifically in relation to the superstory, in answer to some of the comments by others here.
 
Don't know how you managed to read that into what I said. Content not containing content? No idea what that is supposed to mean, sounds like gibberish looking for an argument. All I said was putting in Odyssey only content that was directly related to this story would be cutting out the Horizons players who have been following events so far, and not very fair to them.

I'd be the first to say they haven't made the most out of the content they had already, and could have done much more with existing assets.
If it sounds like gibberish, it's because I'm reflecting your comment which, to me, sounded like gibberish, I just didn't want to put it that way. You seem to be continuing that same line in the above post though, so if you actually mean something else by it I'm all ears.

Games, and media writ-large, whether it's books, movies, TV series, do this all the time.... whether it's cross-seasonal cliffhangers or story arcs bridging into new DLC or outright new mechanics or whatever. Gating the continuing story behind some paid entry is not unusual, unfair or without numerous precedents. Is it a sucky business model? For sure, and I do have some sympathy, but only because FD have teased things along the way they have and not just "ripped off the scab" like they should have at Odyssey's launch. But FD's development of ED is riddled with taking too long to act on key issues.

Personally, I never wanted Odyssey (especially when, as we do seem to agree, the extant ship-based mechanics are so grossly under-utilised)... but we're now over a year into the release of Odyssey with virtually nothing to show for it, save some new mechanical frameworks to enable on-foot gameplay. That's ridiculous.

Using Odyssey-only mechanics to progress the story cannot be beholden to the fact some have come to this with only Horizons in the past... FD chose this path when they ditched development of Odyssey for console.
 
Personally, I never wanted Odyssey (especially when, as we do seem to agree, the extant ship-based mechanics are so grossly under-utilised)... but we're now over a year into the release of Odyssey with virtually nothing to show for it, save some new mechanical frameworks to enable on-foot gameplay. That's ridiculous.

Using Odyssey-only mechanics to progress the story cannot be beholden to the fact some have come to this with only Horizons in the past... FD chose this path when they ditched development of Odyssey for console.
I was talking specifically about new Odyssey content in relation to the story or brought in by the story, in response to a common complaint that the story itself is not bringing in anything new. Speculating on why that might be the case does not exclude the possibility of any new content at all, as evidenced by recent additions like FC interiors or the new ground missions which have nothing to do with the story at all. They are separate issues.

On the issue of new Odyssey content being brought in solely by the story I can simply see the sense in waiting till this story is done, which it almost is, with such new content as the end result, be that Thargoids on the ground or whatever. You disagree with that and think it should all be put in now. And that's fine too. It doesn't make either of us wrong. I was simply trying to provide a reason why the story itself had not introduced any new content yet, or at least none that has to be interacted with to follow the story fully, so that the Horizons players can see this story to its end.

On the issue of no new Odyssey content at all I don't think they can keep people waiting much longer. Little bits of new stuff like the FC interiors and missions have come in dribs and drabs and I get the frustration that there hasn't been more and sooner even though I am more patient about it than some people here.

Both are separate issues again from not being imaginative enough with the content that already exists, which obviously has nothing to do with maintaining two code bases either as it refers to the use of existing assets, and on that we seem to agree. Again, I meant specifically the use of them in the story itself but you can apply it to the whole game as well since no amount of new stuff, as and when it arrives, hides that they could have done more with what we already have and that's been a regular complaint for years. I would even argue that just throwing new stuff at us highlights the failure to maximise what we already have. It's paradoxically a distraction from that failure as well as being a welcome addition.
 
Assuming they can run it, sure. I'm playing Odyssey so I'm not sure who you are aiming that at. To me the ones throwing tantrums are the ones saying get on with giving us more Odyssey content. I'm just speculating on reasons why they haven't yet, specifically in relation to the superstory, in answer to some of the comments by others here.
CM's were the one saying they are focusing on Odyssey content. How and when they will do it, is up to them. But the message is clear.

I don't know how much Azimuth saga will involve players, cause i expect it to just to be some Text Content from Galnet. But new SRV and concourse for FC that's Odyssey content. What did Horizon got in 1 year? Nothing. So looks like they are already doing it.
 
Back
Top Bottom