TheMegaTurnip
Banned
So we now have the Alliance Challenger to play with..
Chieftan Pros:
Very much faster than its new sister
Faster Pitch rates
Has a better Hardpoint vs Distributor ratio
Challenger Pros:
Much more resilliant
Very much smoother to fly, with less twitch
More (potential) DPS
These were the first direct comparisons I've been able to make after my limited time in the ship, However after a little more flying I noticed that the lateral thrust is'nt quite as powerful on the challenger, not hugely different, but less so than its sister ship. Also that the drag from the DD5 on the Chieftan is very much drawn out as opposed to the super nimble Challenger. The Challenger suffers from a rare issue of too small a Distributor, most noticable when using high draw weapons such as Plasma Accelerators, In this respect I feel like the Chieftan outperforms it in Applied DPS and potentially in hardpoint versitility due to the lower draw weapon set. The Chieftan also has a significant advantage when using Bi-Weave shields because of this. Less Distributor draw - More time for Pips in Shields.
However that being said it feels as though it is easier to apply the DPS in the Challenger due to less boost lag and more responsive aft and rear thrusters. Or potentially down to the lower top speed. Much closer to the sweet spot than the Chieftan who's speed in dogfights can be a liability leaving you strung out and drifting waiing for the trust to kick in properly, That effect seems to be lessened in the Challenger, not hugely, but enough to make the difference.
Overall I'd not say the Challenger is a straight upgrade to the Chieftan, but it is a very valid and fun sidegrade. Smoother handling with a good hardpoint layout, a propensity to last longer in fights and maybe also deal out more damage with the right loadout, A classier alternative to the sometimes awkward slide-rocket that is the Chieftan.
Over and out. o7
Chieftan Pros:
Very much faster than its new sister
Faster Pitch rates
Has a better Hardpoint vs Distributor ratio
Challenger Pros:
Much more resilliant
Very much smoother to fly, with less twitch
More (potential) DPS
These were the first direct comparisons I've been able to make after my limited time in the ship, However after a little more flying I noticed that the lateral thrust is'nt quite as powerful on the challenger, not hugely different, but less so than its sister ship. Also that the drag from the DD5 on the Chieftan is very much drawn out as opposed to the super nimble Challenger. The Challenger suffers from a rare issue of too small a Distributor, most noticable when using high draw weapons such as Plasma Accelerators, In this respect I feel like the Chieftan outperforms it in Applied DPS and potentially in hardpoint versitility due to the lower draw weapon set. The Chieftan also has a significant advantage when using Bi-Weave shields because of this. Less Distributor draw - More time for Pips in Shields.
However that being said it feels as though it is easier to apply the DPS in the Challenger due to less boost lag and more responsive aft and rear thrusters. Or potentially down to the lower top speed. Much closer to the sweet spot than the Chieftan who's speed in dogfights can be a liability leaving you strung out and drifting waiing for the trust to kick in properly, That effect seems to be lessened in the Challenger, not hugely, but enough to make the difference.
Overall I'd not say the Challenger is a straight upgrade to the Chieftan, but it is a very valid and fun sidegrade. Smoother handling with a good hardpoint layout, a propensity to last longer in fights and maybe also deal out more damage with the right loadout, A classier alternative to the sometimes awkward slide-rocket that is the Chieftan.
Over and out. o7
Last edited: