Okay, well if you want to apportion blame for the actions of The Code on AEDC so be it.
I can't stop you.
This is exactly what I expected.
Okay, well if you want to apportion blame for the actions of The Code on AEDC so be it.
I can't stop you.
So the original reason for siding with the Alliance no longer exists. Now, it's just a matter of "siding with the little guys".
they are not psychologically capable of friendliness and they do not seek peaceful coexistence.
Updated charts, thanks Mangal.
Again, everyone can see the Alliance oppression against the independents!
The big & nasty Alliance against the small & weak independents...
Sigh.
Ps: nothing directly against OP but I just want to show the reality to all these independents who come and complain about the Allliance oppression here or on Reddit and others channels. Open your eyes, look at the charts and stop crying, it's boring at the end. Play the game, have fun!
The point was there's no "independent" side; they are as much against each other as they are the superpowers.Yes and no... What does the charts represent ? Systems controlled by... Independents are a part of the charts. If you take the results of the charts in consideration, you have to take all of it, not 3 parts of 4. When an independent faction take a system from an Alliance / Federation or Empire faction, the result is that a system switch to independent side (yellow bars).
I resume again... between the Alliance, the Federation, the Empire and the Independents... (if the Thargoids owned systems by BGS, they would be included in this chart but this is not the case AFAIK) So between all the entities named before, who wins and who loses? Thought it was simple to understand.
Yes and no... What does the charts represent ? Systems controlled by... Independents are a part of the charts. If you take the results of the charts in consideration, you have to take all of it, not 3 parts of 4. When an independent faction take a system from an Alliance / Federation or Empire faction, the result is that a system switch to independent side (yellow bars).
I resume again... between the Alliance, the Federation, the Empire and the Independents... (if the Thargoids owned systems by BGS, they would be included in this chart but this is not the case AFAIK) So between all the entities named before, who wins and who loses? Thought it was simple to understand.
The point was there's no "independent" side; they are as much against each other as they are the superpowers.
So the correct thing to do would be to break down the changes more precisely. There are four allegiances, so six separate areas in which systems can be gained and lost.I resume again... between the Alliance, the Federation, the Empire and the Independents... (if the Thargoids owned systems by BGS, they would be included in this chart but this is not the case AFAIK) So between all the entities named before, who wins and who loses? Thought it was simple to understand.
Riverside, no propaganda here,
If I've learnt one thing doing BGS in this game it's that you can't trust a single thing someone says about their activity and intent as long as they can just sit in private group running whatever campaign they want and saying the total opposite publicly.
Yes there is, it is in your post. It was about how you described independants as a collective superpower.
My experience of the only player group where negotiations broke down was that they were only interested in the numbers on a chart & not the actual systems. Perhaps there are exceptions.
I think that when a large group plays in a private group it can be difficult to engage with small groups or individual players that communicate in-game (ie not via an outside app like discord). It is a shame, but fortunately they are pretty easy to keep down. I think of it as like weeding a garden, or turning a ploughed field back into a meadow. I guess they rely on other players assuming a large group cannot be beaten and giving up maybe?
How do you percieve the individual factions that are not the (presumably multi-system) one you support? Do you see flavour, variety & nuance, or do you see a potential expansion source to some more systems?
We are not evil, I promise^^
If the alliance really wanted to go on an aggressive push against independent and federal systems, they could get into LYR space and make the challenger available somewhere. There's only one alliance faction in that whole powerplay zone and they've only got the chief and crusader, and as for the T10, there's more anarchies supplying that one than alliance ports!