That's perhaps a bit optimistic, don't you think?
The only thing pew-pew groups like that do to most people is make them giggle a bit - they are not dangerous bad scary people you need to be afraid of
Got bullied in school, huh? No success in job, no girl, no future huh? its sad that for people like you griefing on weaker players is the only joy you can have in your miserable life
Nice typo here: I can blaze my own trial
But more important, where do you get this info from? I agreed to all interaction? I remember I never agreed being ganked outside of the game´s framework. And I didn´t agree to anything else. Please provide a link with further information.
Nice typo here: I can blaze my own trial
But more important, where do you get this info from? I agreed to all interaction? I remember I never agreed being ganked outside of the game´s framework. And I didn´t agree to anything else. Please provide a link with further information.
As a reminder, what you quoted is of my personal opinion on the matter of PVP.
I assume you're referring to the Learn to play bit. It's more than "veiled derisive language of anti-social players". "Learn to play" is a legitimate issue that has begun to be a problem in this decades games being released. Elite Dangerous is especially prone to this issue, simply due to the vertical nature of its rather steep learning curve. I've seen more people post questions about how X does Y and how does Z interact with A B and C. Granted, these are looking from a top-down perspective. New commanders have to spend a fair lot of time before they're good to go with PVP.
If a player refuses to learn how the game functions, and learns the hard way by jumping right into the game without any, or in the least, minimal knowledge and is blown up by a random commander in open... honestly, what can the company do? It's clear that the player doesn't want to do tutorials or read up on the forums for some quick tips and tricks. We're not going to force them to do tutorials before being able to play.
Simply put: What you might find easy and generic, might be the most difficult thing the other person has to overcome for a day, a week, or even a month before getting into the swing of it.
That´s not very much.
But I admit, it leaves space for interpretation. This is what you did. Short cut interpretation.
I told you, you are just lazy. To stay in the framework of the game would mean you do some player BH, do PP or fight in CZ. Most of the PvPers can´t be asked for that, because of meh..
Ok, gotta go now, RL calls. I expect a solution to this topic when I´m back in the evening.
So long, stay fair and respectful.
Have a good evening.So we have all now come to the shocking conclusion that this whole 'story' was blown up simply for a minority to push their agenda in the interest of their own play style?
Stop forcing your forum PvP on me.
I know all the videos. No clear statements, but much room for interpretation. You are still being lazy.
Its like a saying what is 2+2.I am not lazy. I am just saying what mean Open
Always you can question and say 'still not enough' or i am 'lazy' even if i will show a four fingers.
So then who is really lazy? A person who is trying to explain an obvious thing or a person who cant get what four fingers means?
Nope, its not mine. Its a David interpretationIt´s your interpretation of Open. Nothing more.
Stop it now, I have to leave........!!!
I am just playing in a game by FDev rules. You got a link and videos. If you still looking a deep in a place where is no deep, then you will be just disappointed.So we have all now come to the shocking conclusion that this whole 'story' was blown up simply for a minority to push their agenda in the interest of their own play style?
