News Announcement: Elite: Dangerous coming to Xbox One

Elite Dangerous for Everyone.

It's being reported by the press that it's an Xbox One exclusive so it won't appear on any other console.

so Xbox One is a natural fit for Elite: Dangerous’ console debut.

I think the use of the term "debut" Would hint that its not exclusive just coming first to Xbox One. It would be a shame to pass up over 20 million PS4's for 10 million Xbox Ones. I play on PC but would be willing to buy a second copy On PS4. A game as great as Elite Dangerous deserves to be on every platform it can. Not the Subject of console wars!
 
Console debut in 2015 on Xbox One. We will be able to bring it to other platforms later and we'll talk about that when we have something to announce.

Thank you thank you thank you!

I have a PS4 and an ageing laptop.

I currently play on the laptop and i can't justify a new one currently or a PC at the moment..... I really want Elite Dangerous on PS4!

I am happy to wait!.... Love this game!
 
Last edited:
imho every single PC title on the market suffered from design decisions made for the console version, but well FD, go ahead...
i´d be extremely surprised if it doesn´t.
 
What would you call the Elite rankings? Kill X amount of ships and become Elite in combat, trade X amount, explore X amount... ;)

ok I will admit my shame here.... and risk the wrath of you guys.

I would welcome some more "achievements" in ED, ideally tied to unique ingame decals etc.
 
consoled.png

Oh dear god - We've been consoled!
 
Last edited:
Seeing as the PC I play Elite on is half as powerful as an Xbone, is it not catering to me, the low end PC player that is "compromising" the game? I just love the way when discussing PC Vs Console the Elitist disregard the fact the majority of us are using hardware at least 1 to 2 years old (and older!) and instead concentrate only on the top end of the spectrum conveniently!
 
ok I will admit my shame here.... and risk the wrath of you guys.

I would welcome some more "achievements" in ED, ideally tied to unique ingame decals etc.

Sadly, there are many younger gamers who need this "pat on the back", out of game nonsense... and sadly, even some older gamers fall victim to it! ;) In game stuff is fine IMHO - ranks, reputations, military medals, etc.
 
No boy, console market is MUCH bigger.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/...now-brings-in-more-money-than-console-gaming/
http://www.techradar.com/news/gamin...ing-good-is-happening-on-pc-right-now-1260162
http://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/YAKms/2005-2012-pc-vs-console-gaming-population-growth-rates
http://gearnuke.com/pc-dominates-market-51-console-30-mobile-13-according-new-report/
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/97705-pc-gaming-vs-consoles-the-infographic
http://www.maximumpc.com/bragging_rights_pc_gaming_market_maintains_sales_lead_over_consoles_2014
http://www.techradar.com/news/gaming/12-reasons-pc-gaming-is-better-than-consoles-485178

I could go on...
the main point I raise, which people seem to miss is that this game is long term development
The PC can be upgraded alongside the development
The Xbone CANNOT!
so one will be inferior or the other will be held back
they cannot have the same game, there will, assuming the truth was that it is a long term development game, be a point where one or the other happens

This can only hinder the game eventually.
If its money they wanted - then they should of gone subscription.
 
Thank you thank you thank you!

I have a PS4 and an ageing laptop.

I currently play on the laptop and i can't justify a new one currently or a PC at the moment..... I really want Elite Dangerous on PS4!

I am happy to wait!.... Love this game!

You shouldn't have bought a PS4 in the first place, but a better pc instead... Just stating the obvious here.
 
To be honest technically the game could appear on the Xbox 360 and would make much more of a impact than Xbox 1. Before you all jump up and shout 'burn the heretic' what in E: D is high detail.

Well for one the station but you never see more than one station
A planet which is a sphere with a texture :/
Some ships which don't really push the boat out as you don't see tons at once.

So it could be done on a 360 and this would reach a bigger audience heck even ps3 could run it too.

Will we see the game come to those consoles?
 
That is actually played by a lot of people with low end PCs. There's no harm to the game to being accessible to more players.

Yes, I'm one of them. My then-midrange PC is more than 6 years old. And the game runs perfectly well with all details. Except the second monitor isn't used, which is a pity because it would be useful for things like system map and galactic map, as well as HUD elements.
 
In game stuff is fine IMHO - ranks, reputations, military medals, etc.

Whats the difference ... ? Achievements and in game ranks / milestones etc are one in the same thing in the end ...

This is good news for FD as a company, some of the 'Anti Microsoft' sentiment here though is shocking though.. They are not my favourite company at times, but expect a lot more 'Microsoft paid for this exclusive = evil anti competitive company' from now on here.. Like Sony or any other company don't do that .. get real ...

I expect there will be a PS4 version eventually, FD would be silly to ignore such a big install base, in the end though they have chosen to do this and thats their decision. Hopefully Microsoft can provide them with some Azure / XBlive action for PC gamers as well, which will actually make the server and matchmaking infrastructure better ..

Its win win as far as I am concerned.
 
To be honest technically the game could appear on the Xbox 360 and would make much more of a impact than Xbox 1. Before you all jump up and shout 'burn the heretic' what in E: D is high detail.

Well for one the station but you never see more than one station
A planet which is a sphere with a texture :/
Some ships which don't really push the boat out as you don't see tons at once.

So it could be done on a 360 and this would reach a bigger audience heck even ps3 could run it too.

Will we see the game come to those consoles?

I think the main issue would be maintaining a decent frame rate than the detail of the graphics. 360 wouldn't stand a chance with it's very limited RAM.
 
Well overall I think this is a bad thing for us on the PC. Unless FD is hiring a new group of developers just to do this port (which is sounds unlikely) then the team that is already distracted with the Mac port/maintenance project will have to fund the resources for this.

Since release yes they've added content but the game still feels terribly empty. Yes there are 4 billion systems but after you've explored about 10 you've seen pretty much everything. The same goes for delivery and combat missions which at least in the systems I've been working have really dried up since the release. The part about this that bothers me the most is that the PC users provided the capitol or at least a significant portion of it for a full and complete game. At launch people kept saying the content is coming, just give them a little time. Well yes we've got some patches but they've done little in my personal opinion to take this game where it should have been at release or where it needs to be to maintain the majority of its fan base.

Now the ports come in, first the Mac and now the xBox. This is now splitting the development into three different code bases for the same Dev team. That will make the task of maintaining the product that much harder (in terms of resource cost) as you have to do everything three times. Now add in additional content that is optional and the code splits yet again. With the first paid expansion they go from 3 different bases to six as they need to maintain the base for people who don't buy the expansion and with the second it goes to nine. God help us if they add support for PS4.

The bottom line is that it will all come down to their investment in the game. While they will always lose some efficiency by adding a new platform, a good deal of the impact can be minimized by adding resources. As a publicly traded company FD is not at the end of the day going to be drive by the things that we say but rather the need to generate an ever increasing return for their investors. Unfortunately while we would like to think that those of us who backed the game before it released were investing, the people who hold stock are the ones they really care about providing a return. FD's operating margin is a big part of how profitable they will be at the end of the day and adding resources is a serious hit to this factor.

I'm still holding on to some hope that FD will make ED a decent game but after the two months its been out I find it harder and harder to sit down in play. I traded up to a fully upgraded Type 7, put enough away to get a fully tricked out Asp to begin exploring and then a nice nest egg for emergencies. Then I went out and explored for the last three week and yes I found a lot of previously systems not yet visited by another player (or at least that scanned its planets/stars/etc..) and have my name now stamped on them. Now what? Combat isn't something I find a lot of joy in, Trading is nothing more than a grind now and after you see the first 10 or so star systems exploring shows you nothing new and is really perhaps even more or a grind (scoop, scan, fly by, repeat) as nothing interesting happens while you exploring systems.

Adding platforms without significant investment in resources is going to slow adding the content that is vital to give this game legs to take it into the future.
 

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
I could go on...
the main point I raise, which people seem to miss is that this game is long term development
The PC can be upgraded alongside the development
The Xbone CANNOT!
so one will be inferior or the other will be held back
they cannot have the same game, there will, assuming the truth was that it is a long term development game, be a point where one or the other happens

This can only hinder the game eventually.
If its money they wanted - then they should of gone subscription.

While a players PC *can* be upgraded as the game develops, the minimum PC specs for the game have been published for a while now - if Frontier were to raise the minimum PC spec too much as the game develops then some players may no longer be able to play. Of course, Frontier do have the benefit of the game analytics and know (as Michael inferred earlier) the capabilities of PCs that players are using to play the game and could raise the minimum PC spec over time in such a way that few players would suffer poor performance with a new version of the game.
 

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
That is a terrible concept, ther very idea that *they* can affect *our* galaxy but *we* cannot do anything about *them*.

Ok take a scenario such as: The Imperials are blockading an independant star system trying to force it to join the Empire.

Lets say that players on Xbox are in a different 'bubble' and tend to side with the Feds who are covertly undermining the Imperial forces. Whilst a large number of PC based players are siding with the Imperials for whatever reason.
How would this work ? As each side would not be seeing each other and thus from their perspective their efforts should be leading them to victory.

It would be very odd indeed (if not game breaking) if every player in your 'instance' was on one side and yet that side lost because of the actions of 'invisible' players in a different instance !

It's no different from the status quo (except for the number of players involved, maybe) - we have all three game modes sharing the same background simulation.
 
Back
Top Bottom