Anything goes in anarchy, just don't shoot the station itself.
What is your cmdr name wayner506 because i have attacked a corvette at obsidian orbital with torpedoes recently, it could be me ^^
Aaand that's why so many Russians were banned from the Olympics, Comrade.
Or controlling faction's NPCs.Anything goes in anarchy, just don't shoot the station itself.
The same people who thought heat weapons should destroy a ship in seconds too, no need for lasers or bullets, just a hairdryer
Good to know, thanks Adelind.Anything goes in anarchy, just don't shoot the station itself.
Torpedos fly at 120m/s.. I can outrun them on foot! They are way more balanced than heat weapons.
While we are at it, let's make it jus one weapon type, one shield type, one armour type, one ship type. This way everyone will be flying the same thing.
A) Not when the targeted CMDR is in the mail slot
B)You can effectively "dive bomb" torps onto larger ships. Almost impossible to avoid.
The idea that 2400+ MJ of shields should be able to be defeated by one or two torpedo strikes is nothing short of absurd, especially considering how long those shields take to regen.
Yknow with that video on page 1, unless the author was flying badly on purpose to show how a gank works, it should have been possible for them to thrust upwards. That missile/torpedo had literal seconds from hitting them, so it could have been dodged. The pilot goes upwards, the torp rams into the area above the mailslot and the station finishes them off.
I'm guessing it looked something like this :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2Vpab6_5m0
For better or worse,FD are working on it..![]()
Destroying something worth A LOT of money is always fun... People just don't want to admit itThat video pretty much say why people don't play Open anymore. What even is the point of that gank? How is this even fun?
And, deliberately or not, you just reinforced his pointDestroying something worth A LOT of money is always fun... People just don't want to admit it![]()
These guys are PvP'ers? Could have fooled me.And I think even PvPers are getting tired of doing it.
Yknow with that video on page 1, unless the author was flying badly on purpose to show how a gank works, it should have been possible for them to thrust upwards. That missile/torpedo had literal seconds from hitting them, so it could have been dodged. The pilot goes upwards, the torp rams into the area above the mailslot and the station finishes them off.
It's called "situational awareness" - this is a legitimate tactic with bombs even in real life.
Or point defenses.
Think about how huge torpedoes are, the sheer amount of absurd power going into that explosion. That is why they are so slow compared to missiles. Dive bombing is a high risk/high reward tactic.
The problem here isn't the torps, the problem is the griefing. With perhaps a side order of shields taking way too long to regenerate.
Not really ( i've used torpedoes once LONG time ago so i might not be right), you can just ram enemy ship and then launch them.Reverberating Cascade Torpedos aren't the problem. Anywhere other than the air lock they're easy to avoid as long as you know about them. FDEV need to deal with their use at stations, not gimp a niche weapon with difficult application in real combat.
While we are at it, let's make it jus one weapon type, one shield type, one armour type, one ship type. This way everyone will be flying the same thing.
Yup, same as heat weapons: It's just impossible to balance it.1) Then the poster goes above 100 m/s, gets hit by a suicide eagle, destroyed by the station, and you all switch your arguments to "you shouldn't have been speeding; it's your fault you died." Can't outrun a torp going 99 m/s.
2) FDL wing interdicts Cutter or other large vessel, drops directly on top of target ship, torps launched just as the large ship comes out of its spin (because THAT was a great addition to interdictions), large ship shields drop almost instantly. Also take into consideration just how un-maneuverable large ships are comparatively. They arent dodging anything; their strength lays with their shields. Cascade torps completely erase that strong point for almost no drawback.
3) Point Defense? HA. Couldn't get two PD to reliable shoot down an incoming torp during an experiment in a controlled environment.
4) Dive-bombing torps is low risk, high reward. It doesnt take a lot to dive bomb a large ship, especially when that ship is unsuspecting or just coming out of an interdiction.
I really don't get why people still defend Reverberating Cascade torps or Heat weapons. They are both shining examples of incredibly bad game design and horrible game balance.