Patch Notes Update Beta 2.2 - Update 6

SentineI

SentineI
Eera said:
And RNGineer still remain....
Click to expand...
And so does Power Play. Both seem like someone's pet design, which they thought sounded great on paper... And are then unwilling to admit that more than little tweaks are necessary to fix them in the real world. (Alternative explanation: FDev simply doesn't have the resources for big revamps of major game elements, so instead they leave somewhat-broken elements in the game.)

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

optimal_909 said:
I know, no promises, no ETAs, but is there any indication when 2.2 will go live?
Click to expand...
At the same time as what could have been called "Beta Update 7" ;-)

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Hexcaliber said:
The basic design of engineers is not going to change, nor does it need to.
Click to expand...
That depends upon whether you consider a "Casino gambling"-style UI to be a "basic design" or not :)
 
Last edited:

Marc_Hicks

Marc_Hicks
Viracke said:
Yeah I was one of the 30% i am sure most of the 70% regrets voting for timed transfer that is why they whine about the price.
Click to expand...

The only "whining" I see is from those who are still aggro that the majority won out in this discussion.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

ChrisH said:
And so does Power Play. Both seem like someone's pet design, which they thought sounded great on paper... And are then unwilling to admit that more than little tweaks are necessary to fix them in the real world. (Alternative explanation: FDev simply doesn't have the resources for big revamps of major game elements, so instead they leave somewhat-broken elements in the game.)

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -


At the same time as what could have been called "Beta Update 7" ;-)

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -


That depends upon whether you consider a "Casino gambling"-style UI to be a "basic design" or not :)
Click to expand...

I agree that the spinning wheel needs to go-as calling in favours has made that random element all but redundant. I am cool with the rest of the UI, but really hope that future updates will allow material quality and repeat upgrades of the same ship to push the result in the Commanders' favour.
 

Ralph Vargr

Ralph Vargr
ChrisH said:
And so does Power Play. Both seem like someone's pet design, which they thought sounded great on paper... And are then unwilling to admit that more than little tweaks are necessary to fix them in the real world.
Click to expand...

And thus, would lose their jobs, and the Power Play fiasco could be scuttled with a quick "shower scene" from "Dallas". :)
 

Starbreaker

Starbreaker
The choice between going back and revamping old game systems vs. continue to develop new features for the game. I believe new features takes priority, would you like an entire update be focused on revamps of PP and engineers? Or do you want multicrew and avatars instead?
 

V'larr

V'larr
Starbreaker said:
The choice between going back and revamping old game systems vs. continue to develop new features for the game. I believe new features takes priority, would you like an entire update be focused on revamps of PP and engineers? Or do you want multicrew and avatars instead?
Click to expand...

Me personally? Yeah, I'd rather PP and Engineers be revamped/improved/revisited/balanced/etc. I couldn't care less about multicrew (in fact after watching SC streams I don't think I'll like it much at all, if it allows piracy and stowaways and such), and I also don't really care about avatars - if I had the option to turn off the NPC ones to save on performance, I would!

But, that is just *me personally*.
 

Trekari

T
Still no mentioned fix for the Wing "Cannot connect to Matchmaking Server" error.

How many months will that be a problem? I'm up to 8 friends I've talked out of buying the game so far because of this. Shall I shoot for 9?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom