rootsrat
Volunteer Moderator
Hang on, why do you have such a massive avatar? It looks great, just wondering.
Forum allows to 250 x 250, so I made one with that size
Patch Notes Update Beyond - Chapter Four - Beta (Week 4)
- Thread starter Will Flanagan
- Start date
- Status
Forum allows to 250 x 250, so I made one with that size
Forum allows to 250 x 250, so I made one with that size
Sorry mr. moderator, but it is just 100x100 for us mere mortals. Just checked.
Forum allows to 250 x 250, so I made one with that size
Don't want to grass you up mate but ...
Note: The maximum size of your custom image is 100 by 100 pixels or 250.0 KB (whichever is smaller).
Edit: whoops, ninja'd by sleut
Please tell the high yield shell guy to stop balancing things around. I think he hates the Mamba, too.
rootsrat
Volunteer Moderator
200 x 200 for me! Which what this size is. One rule for them...
I am going back to my old avatar soon, don't worry
This is one is only temporary while (be vewy quiet) I'm hunting Thawgoids.
Hey FD!
Just a little heads-up as apparently there has been some confusion. When the almost unequivocal feedback provides is that the speed of the Mamba doesn't match its role/lore as a racer, we may have been not clear enough. What we were trying to say is that the mamba needed to be faster. As in, the number that represents its speed needs to go up, not down. Because that means it is slower, which makes it even less of a racer.
I hope this clarifies the uncertainty!
I am still waiting for conformation that it applies to ship names as well. Common sense would expect that it should.
Sadly, I have to report that it doesn't work for ship names.
Well boo.
Guess I'll have to send in another slew of support tickets for "Grasshopper" and "Bullet Ant" and "Monarch" after the update drops.
I know support tickets are a way to report bugs but telling them "it's the name of a kind of insect, not a swear" wasn't what I had in mind.
you should be able to see your ships name censored once your relog.
Hey FD!
Just a little heads-up as apparently there has been some confusion. When the almost unequivocal feedback provides is that the speed of the Mamba doesn't match its role/lore as a racer, we may have been not clear enough. What we were trying to say is that the mamba needed to be faster. As in, the number that represents its speed needs to go up, not down. Because that means it is slower, which makes it even less of a racer.
I hope this clarifies the uncertainty!
+1 give it more speed, the heat bug is fixed and that is great, reduce the engine capacitor usage at the pre patch level! A ship based on a racing prototype that just got slower in a patch and got the boost engine capacitor usage doubled... what kind of joke is this?
Hey FD!
Just a little heads-up as apparently there has been some confusion. When the almost unequivocal feedback provides is that the speed of the Mamba doesn't match its role/lore as a racer, we may have been not clear enough. What we were trying to say is that the mamba needed to be faster. As in, the number that represents its speed needs to go up, not down. Because that means it is slower, which makes it even less of a racer.
I hope this clarifies the uncertainty!
+1 Mamba should be the fastest ship on the table, even if this is harmful to health, it must be a hit and run, with couture style
If it's meant to be a fast hit and run ship, its shields didn't get the memo.
are the shields so overpowered?
423 MJ with a stock A shield and no boosters, 4000 MJ with reinforced prismatics and a full set of heavy duty A boosters. If it's a fast, maneouverable, hard punching shield tank then it's OP. So FDev decided to keep the hard punching shield tank part and nerfed the other two.
Open the launcher manually (not from steam) and launch beta. Steam VR automatically 'gets it'.
Cool, thanks!
- Status
Similar threads
