My "idea" was more a reaction to the mass immigration we see today. I never had any issue with immigration before. It's the mass immigration that has woken up my protective instincts.
So, tell me, what if they want Sharia Law implemented in Finland? Would you be ok with that? And don't tell me it's never gonna happen. They already have Sharia Courts in Britain. And a major in London who wants to ban women from dressing "naughty". Now THAT'S insane. What next, obligatory Hijab for every woman, to not offend the profet? It will happen when they become enough in numbers, mark my words
1.
For this to Happen they would need to have the Majority in Finland.
Which will never Happen.
2.
I think you have an Fundamental Misunderstanding of Sharia Courts in the UK.
The Sharia Courts are an Alternate "out of Court" Settling of Disputes which is available.
It Requires the Consent of Both Parties in the Dispute to work. So if either of the two Disputing Parties does not explicitly wish to Settle the Matter in a Sharia Court. The Dispute will be Settled under UK Laws and Rights in complete Ignorance of Sharia Law.
Moreover. A Sharia Court is Limited to Civil Disputes. It allows handling stuff like Divorces etc under Muslim Rights. By pretty much making a Contract between the Parties about how the Dispute is Settled.
The moment the UKs Laws are Broken the Sharia Court is entirely Meaningless and has no Power at all.
This sort of thing is happening all around by the way.
Political Parties have their own Tribunals.
Companies have their own Tribunals.
Heck even some Clubs have their own Tribunals.
Requirement for an Government Court to become active in a Civil Rights Question.
Is that this Dispute is bought to Court by one of the Parties Involved.
If the Parties Involved decide to instead Settle the Dispute by a Contract made by an Arbitator of whatever choosing they wish. They are allowed to do so.
This Contract however is of course still required to hold true to the National Laws. It can neither Overrule nor Break these Laws.
For example. My Company also holds such Tribunals when Regulations were Broken during Work.
And they can setup Disciplinary Actions as well as settling Disputes of Compensation.
But only if the Worker as well as the Company Allows it.
And only as long as the Contract Formed does not Break any Laws.
The moment they for example say that the Employee is Fired without having been warned because he broke a Regulation.
The Employee can deny this and go to an actual Court. Because the Law States that Breaches of Regulations need to be Warned Once before you can Fire the Employee.
Same if the Employee is Ruled to Pay for Damages resulting from a Mistake he Made.
He can go to the National Court. Because the Law says that he cannot be held for Mistakes and that the Company has to either take the risk or have an Insurance for such. As Humans are not Unfailliable and normal Workers cannot Pay the Cost of a Train Derailing for example. Of course the Employee might still face other Punishments on National Court if he is found to have done the mistake because he was lazy or didnt care etc. But thats for a National Court to Decide.
In the UK.
Example.
If a Man Abuses his Daughter or another Female Child for whatever Reason. And the Sharia Court Rules this is fine and within Muslim Law. This Ruling is useless.
Because the Moment the Police finds out. The matter will go to the National Court. Entirely regardless of whatever the Sharia Court says.
I think I said this on the Refugee Matter already.
But Mate Seriously. Stop believing the Ridiculous Headlines from the Right Wing Papers.
They are Talking alot of Rubbish if the Day is long.
I am sure you read this before.
But in Germany a Judge Ruled that a Man was allowed to Beat his Wife cause he was Muslim and this was in his Culture.
This went all over the Right Wing News after all.
What they did not Report. Was that the Judge short time later was Dismissed from his Post for Breaking his Oath and that the Ruling was Reversed without ever becoming Enacted because it was clearly in Breach of German Laws.
Same for this one.
The Right Wing Newspapers Title Sharia Courts and Law in UK.
They completely leave out that these Courts have no Actual Power but only Serve as Advising Arbitators which Rule According to Sharia and then offer a Contract based on this to Settle this Dispute.
They completely ignore that both Parties involved in the Dispute can refuse this Contract and always go to an actual Court with the matter.
They also talk about it like this Court would even be allowed to Overrule UKs Law or Legalize Criminal Activities. Which is completely Wrong because these Courts have absolutely no Powers on any State Persecution of Criminal Activity and or Laws.
Seriously.
At least look this Stuff up before you Spread it around....
