While it has been confirmed that the Clair DLC and the other broad stuff before it was real, everything else that hasn't been revealed from the 4Chan leaker must still be taken with caution, with a grain of salt in the most broadest way. I still see and sense some plausible fishy stuff in some of the stuff that hasn't been officially revealed yet. There's an equal chance any of them may be 100% true or not.
(The information below is subject of speculation only. There's an equal 50 to 50 percent chance that everything each to the yet to be announced "leaked" information and to the stuff I have to say about them are true or false.)
First off, Frontier Developments stated the new major IP licence game say there will be only one game with in the licensing, yet the leaker says there are two Jurassic World games being planned (Jurassic World Evolution 2 and Jurassic World Survival). Why would they plan two when they stated they only planned one for that licensing? Surely Frontier would've said so when they announced their starting plans with the IP licensing before hand.
Two, if a sequel to Jurassic World Evolution were to be made, it would have to be extremely different from the other by modern standards. Reusing land dinosaurs in just enhanced environments and a similar copied story using them just doesn't seem very plausible for both Frontier Developments and Universal Pictures, because it's kind of like, "Why get this when you can get this instead, just JWE using the same engine, visuals and art styles and designs, but with more content and certain enhancements?", that doesn't sound like what a mainstream video game developer company would ever do when making modern sequels for this kind of genre. Some indie games I know of have done this with their own different genre games, but indies are different and a lot more complicated to explain. While there may be some exceptions to this matter, I just don't convincingly see it happening for anything with the name "Jurassic World Evolution".
(Speculations if a sequel were to be true, it would "probably" focus solely on non-dinosaurs, like maybe marine reptiles or flying stuff, or even both, just to keep the different games more diverse from each other and not too repetitive by modern mainstream game standards. But this can be conflicted by just what the Clair's Sanctuary has proven and will prove to offer, as this could be a start for them to consider these features to be in the first and plausible only game of the line down in the much further future.)
The leaker also says they "can't fix" the current game and are going to "make a new one". These statements sound so "fan-ish" because it's generally a way for players I've seen in posts as their way of saying the game doesn't have what they personally wanted or expected at this given time. These are not the statements a company who loves and constantly develops this game would logically say.
(And I do have one good question: Is a squeal to an existing game, made by the same company, considered to be a new IP? I'm not good with this kind of knowledge, so any help can be helpful.)
Thirdly, regarding the 1993 DLC, community manager, Paul Crowther, stated some months ago in last year's autumn in a Reddit post their focus for the game's building aesthetics are focused to be of Jurassic World style, rather than Jurassic Park style like what the leaker predicted. Further more, the leaker says it also involves into "Getting Jurassic Park operating again", or "back online". I currently don't see how this could really work in the game since Isla Nublar by story standards is an island that will become lit on fire by Mt. Sibo, like in the latest film, so how would that make any sense considering what it will do and leave behind afterwards?
However, one way how this can be the other way is these statements always have a potential to become outdated as they also use the word 'currently or current' and you should know what that means by now. Also, maybe the 1993 story for Jurassic Park may take place at a different point in time in the past in the story's timeline or perhaps in an alternate timeline instead. But as of right now, I don't see this as plausible just yet because it feels too, let's just say, odd, especially when the game confirms that both parks on Nublar are no more. But remember, these don't solidly confirm anything yet.
If, and only if, it's not 100% true, then what is it? I think what my half skeptic suspicion on them are is that someone found out about the legit stuff and went to leak them while also adding bogus information to get you hyped on the stuff that won't be true either intentionally (straight lying to you) or unwittingly (just silly ol' misinformation and misunderstanding spread rumors). But remember, these and everything else I said above are only guesses.
My suggestions to everyone reading this, is no matter how true or skeptical some information on the internet may turn out, even if some may become one or the other in one place, it's best to always use great caution and a grain of salt until and/or in-case official statements and reveals show so or other wise. Internet trickster users can be smarter than you think, and this may or may not be the case here. So please, be careful with what ever you find that isn't from an official source at your own risk and use you're own best judgments on them.
(The information below is subject of speculation only. There's an equal 50 to 50 percent chance that everything each to the yet to be announced "leaked" information and to the stuff I have to say about them are true or false.)
First off, Frontier Developments stated the new major IP licence game say there will be only one game with in the licensing, yet the leaker says there are two Jurassic World games being planned (Jurassic World Evolution 2 and Jurassic World Survival). Why would they plan two when they stated they only planned one for that licensing? Surely Frontier would've said so when they announced their starting plans with the IP licensing before hand.
Two, if a sequel to Jurassic World Evolution were to be made, it would have to be extremely different from the other by modern standards. Reusing land dinosaurs in just enhanced environments and a similar copied story using them just doesn't seem very plausible for both Frontier Developments and Universal Pictures, because it's kind of like, "Why get this when you can get this instead, just JWE using the same engine, visuals and art styles and designs, but with more content and certain enhancements?", that doesn't sound like what a mainstream video game developer company would ever do when making modern sequels for this kind of genre. Some indie games I know of have done this with their own different genre games, but indies are different and a lot more complicated to explain. While there may be some exceptions to this matter, I just don't convincingly see it happening for anything with the name "Jurassic World Evolution".
(Speculations if a sequel were to be true, it would "probably" focus solely on non-dinosaurs, like maybe marine reptiles or flying stuff, or even both, just to keep the different games more diverse from each other and not too repetitive by modern mainstream game standards. But this can be conflicted by just what the Clair's Sanctuary has proven and will prove to offer, as this could be a start for them to consider these features to be in the first and plausible only game of the line down in the much further future.)
The leaker also says they "can't fix" the current game and are going to "make a new one". These statements sound so "fan-ish" because it's generally a way for players I've seen in posts as their way of saying the game doesn't have what they personally wanted or expected at this given time. These are not the statements a company who loves and constantly develops this game would logically say.
(And I do have one good question: Is a squeal to an existing game, made by the same company, considered to be a new IP? I'm not good with this kind of knowledge, so any help can be helpful.)
Thirdly, regarding the 1993 DLC, community manager, Paul Crowther, stated some months ago in last year's autumn in a Reddit post their focus for the game's building aesthetics are focused to be of Jurassic World style, rather than Jurassic Park style like what the leaker predicted. Further more, the leaker says it also involves into "Getting Jurassic Park operating again", or "back online". I currently don't see how this could really work in the game since Isla Nublar by story standards is an island that will become lit on fire by Mt. Sibo, like in the latest film, so how would that make any sense considering what it will do and leave behind afterwards?
However, one way how this can be the other way is these statements always have a potential to become outdated as they also use the word 'currently or current' and you should know what that means by now. Also, maybe the 1993 story for Jurassic Park may take place at a different point in time in the past in the story's timeline or perhaps in an alternate timeline instead. But as of right now, I don't see this as plausible just yet because it feels too, let's just say, odd, especially when the game confirms that both parks on Nublar are no more. But remember, these don't solidly confirm anything yet.
If, and only if, it's not 100% true, then what is it? I think what my half skeptic suspicion on them are is that someone found out about the legit stuff and went to leak them while also adding bogus information to get you hyped on the stuff that won't be true either intentionally (straight lying to you) or unwittingly (just silly ol' misinformation and misunderstanding spread rumors). But remember, these and everything else I said above are only guesses.
My suggestions to everyone reading this, is no matter how true or skeptical some information on the internet may turn out, even if some may become one or the other in one place, it's best to always use great caution and a grain of salt until and/or in-case official statements and reveals show so or other wise. Internet trickster users can be smarter than you think, and this may or may not be the case here. So please, be careful with what ever you find that isn't from an official source at your own risk and use you're own best judgments on them.
Last edited:
in regards to the leaker’s information and the speculative sequel.
