What would be the motivation for that? "snip".
I never said it was deliberate, and so i will provide no motive..
But others in this thread "claim" that they would not have pre-ordered e.t.c if they were not under the impression that they would have received a "SPECIFIC" free ship.
now as i said. i think these people are talking a lot of whoo haa and baloney. and that argument is not valid in any way shape or form..
I think they would have pre ordered even if the statement was worded so specifically that even a person who could not read english would have been able to tell it was not going to be handed to you for free.
But There in lies the outline of a motive...
"boost pre-order"
Again i will just reiterate. what i see,
I see a paragraph that was worded incorrectly, But still specifically states that it would be purchasable with in game credits..
the only way to be confused by it is by not fully reading the paragraph. If you stopped after the part where is said free ship. "about 1/3rd of the way through the paragraph"
then yes it does say you would get the cobra for free in game..
If you finished reading the thing it specifically states you would have to pay in game credits for it..
Legally this is enough to cover FD from any breach of uk trade laws..
Morally?
then that's a different matter. Wouldn't hurt to just say..
"sorry people we will try and make it a bit more clear in the future, But it does state that you have to use in game credits to buy it. and that it would become available to you for free. Sorry for the confusion"
Obviously i wouldn't use that exact statement if i was them as it implies culpability. when the fact is the culpable ones are the ones who did not fully read the paragraph..
but i dont think that.
"sorry you were to lazy to read a paragraph people, next time we will try to keep it down to 2-3 words of single syllables so you dont get confuzed"
is going to make any one happy.