I've not been around much for a few months, so may of missed some comms around this, but:
Why is the transition from the old "CG" format to the new being managed in such a poor way? I ask as i would of thought the logical method would of been to:
Internal design/develop/build/test
Continue with the old CG format
Announce the new format
Engage with the community/design/develop/build/test
Announce go live
Cut over from old CG format one week, to the new the following
Instead what we have is a complete loss of the CG functionality until further notice. Which strikes me as bizarre and demonstrates a lack of planning.
Why is the transition from the old "CG" format to the new being managed in such a poor way? I ask as i would of thought the logical method would of been to:
Internal design/develop/build/test
Continue with the old CG format
Announce the new format
Engage with the community/design/develop/build/test
Announce go live
Cut over from old CG format one week, to the new the following
Instead what we have is a complete loss of the CG functionality until further notice. Which strikes me as bizarre and demonstrates a lack of planning.