Hardware & Technical Computer Build to run Elite Dangerous

Any thoughts on this rig? It's a couple of years old now, but I think it should be sufficient.

Core i5 760 2.8GHz O/Cd to 4.0Ghz
8GB dual channel DDR3 1600
250GB Samsung SSD
Coolermaster 700W PSU

Current gfx card is a Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 6870 Vapour-X 1024MB, which I'm planning to upgrade - probably to some variety of an R9 270X (although I'm undecided on how much on-board memory to go for). Not sure if I really need to throw any more money at the gfx card?

i run a q6600 2.4ghz over clocked to 3ghz, with gtx 760 2gb gfx, 4gb system ram and runs the alpha fine
 
Some motherboards will only run the second Pci-e at x4 even with only one card connected so watch for that.

That's a decent overclock fom that CPU, I have the same but run it standard, is the 3.4 its base freq now or is that it in turbo mode as before it would of been 2.8 - 3.1 ?

Hi PvtTUX,

As far as I understand it overclocking with the multiplier is within the turbo. When monitoring, it fluctuates downwards but never goes above 3.4 with a 34x multiplier, or 3.5 with the max 35x multiplier. I'm guessing that if you set it to 35x multiplier, its base freq is then 3.2 and its turbo 3.5.

Perhaps someone can confirm that's how it works?
 
Hi PvtTUX,

As far as I understand it overclocking with the multiplier is within the turbo. When monitoring, it fluctuates downwards but never goes above 3.4 with a 34x multiplier, or 3.5 with the max 35x multiplier. I'm guessing that if you set it to 35x multiplier, its base freq is then 3.2 and its turbo 3.5.

Perhaps someone can confirm that's how it works?
AFAIK, Intel Turbo Boost is just another way of "telling" the CPU to ramp up frequency when under load.

There are voltage and temperatures to consider there, and Turbo settings (how to allocate the boost, IIRC the default is much higher ratio for single core than for all cores). If you set a higher than stock multiplier in BIOS (in other words: manually overclock), there are several possibilities there too (just as ASUS UEFI had default 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.0 for it 4770K OC profile), and you can set same multiplier for all cores or different for each and every one.

And then you have the motherboard power saving options, CPU (Speedstep etc.) power saving options and OS power management to mess around with things too :). If you set the multiplier to 35 for all cores (with 100 MHz FSB) and disable all power saving functions, the CPU should run always at 3.5 GHz (even when idle, but no worry, modern CPUs use very little power even if idling at full clock rate). If you have power saving enabled, the observed multiplier may fluctuate anywhere between 16 (or even 9) and 35, depending on how drastic powers saving options you use.
 
If you set the multiplier to 35 for all cores (with 100 MHz FSB) and disable all power saving functions, the CPU should run always at 3.5 GHz (even when idle, but no worry, modern CPUs use very little power even if idling at full clock rate). If you have power saving enabled, the observed multiplier may fluctuate anywhere between 16 (or even 9) and 35, depending on how drastic powers saving options you use.

So actually, I was entirely wrong then! :D
 
Speaking of tower coolers (is the Hyper 212 Evo a 'tower cooler'?) if you get one of those, along with a 'K' i5 processor and maybe even the second fan option on the Hyper 212 Evo, then would you be good to go for safe overclocking when the time comes?

I am running an Intel 4770K at 4.2 with a 212 Evo and it runs cool without one problem at all. So not sure why others are saying otherwise, but as I have with the dual fan configuration it works fine for me, and yes it is a tower cooler. Very easy to install, but be sure of the ram clearance before buying any tower cooler. The evo works fine on an Asus Z86-Plus but to be safe I used very low profile Corsair 1.35 volt ram. Personally I can say the EVO is an excellent value.

Calebe
 

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
Yeah, I've considered the 280X. Not sure if it'd be overkill or not. Decisions, decisions! :D

Very happy with my 280X - it's the Sapphire Vapor-X variant and is not at all noisy under low to moderate load. The fans do pick up somewhat during the benchmarks (in this spreadsheet) I've been running while stripping unwanted programs (that I have installed since I last flattened the PC) out with a view to optimising performance.
 
Right, so I had £350 come my way to spend, Quite a lot for me (spare that is) and I have just gone and brought the following ...

MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC 2048MB GDDR5 PCI-Express

AMD Piledriver FX-8 Eight Core 8350 Black Edition 4.00GHz (Socket AM3+)

Pretty pleased with both of those for that price (Next day delivery as well)

I Think I'll be ok to run Elite now ... :smilie: (When the Beta comes :rolleyes:)
 
Right, so I had £350 come my way to spend, Quite a lot for me (spare that is) and I have just gone and brought the following ...

MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC 2048MB GDDR5 PCI-Express

AMD Piledriver FX-8 Eight Core 8350 Black Edition 4.00GHz (Socket AM3+)

Pretty pleased with both of those for that price (Next day delivery as well)

I Think I'll be ok to run Elite now ... :smilie: (When the Beta comes :rolleyes:)
You got good bang for £ there. :)
 
Ladies and Gentlemen, I need some advice!

My PC needs replacing and I'm a bit behind the times of what's good and what's not. I'd need to buy something from a PC World or something similar, there's no way I could build something myself. I found the following and wondered if it would be suitable;

http://www.pcworld.co.uk/gbuk/desktop-pc-monitors/desktop-pcs/desktop-pcs/hp-pavilion-500-119ea-desktop-pc-21775671-pdt.html

As it's quite a cheap set-up I could then spend £120-150 on a better graphics card. What do you guys think? My budget is £500 for a system that will play Elite to a good standard for a long time. If you know of anything better, I'd be glad to hear it. Thanks in advance x
 
Back
Top Bottom