I'm looking for opinions, not hard factsSo far we have nothing else than 2 Alpha builds for reference, your PC should run them fine. IMHO you should wait and see how it performs before deciding on any upgrades.
I'm looking for opinions, not hard factsSo far we have nothing else than 2 Alpha builds for reference, your PC should run them fine. IMHO you should wait and see how it performs before deciding on any upgrades.
Ah, then: if you're gonna upgrade, go for GTX 770 or R9 280X. If those are too expensive, best bang for buck might be GTX 760.I'm looking for opinions, not hard facts![]()
Any thoughts on this rig? It's a couple of years old now, but I think it should be sufficient.
Core i5 760 2.8GHz O/Cd to 4.0Ghz
8GB dual channel DDR3 1600
250GB Samsung SSD
Coolermaster 700W PSU
Current gfx card is a Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 6870 Vapour-X 1024MB, which I'm planning to upgrade - probably to some variety of an R9 270X (although I'm undecided on how much on-board memory to go for). Not sure if I really need to throw any more money at the gfx card?
i run a q6600 2.4ghz over clocked to 3ghz, with gtx 760 2gb gfx, 4gb system ram and runs the alpha fine
Yeah, I've considered the 280X. Not sure if it'd be overkill or not. Decisions, decisions!Ah, then: if you're gonna upgrade, go for GTX 770 or R9 280X. If those are too expensive, best bang for buck might be GTX 760.
To quote myself: C'mon, it's ELITE! Nothing is overkill!Yeah, I've considered the 280X. Not sure if it'd be overkill or not. Decisions, decisions!![]()
That's a dangerous line of thought for my savings accountTo quote myself: C'mon, it's ELITE! Nothing is overkill!![]()
We don't tend to talk much when we meetShhh, just don't tell my wife...![]()
Shhh, this is a PG-8 Forum...We don't tend to talk much when we meet![]()
Some motherboards will only run the second Pci-e at x4 even with only one card connected so watch for that.
That's a decent overclock fom that CPU, I have the same but run it standard, is the 3.4 its base freq now or is that it in turbo mode as before it would of been 2.8 - 3.1 ?
AFAIK, Intel Turbo Boost is just another way of "telling" the CPU to ramp up frequency when under load.Hi PvtTUX,
As far as I understand it overclocking with the multiplier is within the turbo. When monitoring, it fluctuates downwards but never goes above 3.4 with a 34x multiplier, or 3.5 with the max 35x multiplier. I'm guessing that if you set it to 35x multiplier, its base freq is then 3.2 and its turbo 3.5.
Perhaps someone can confirm that's how it works?
If you set the multiplier to 35 for all cores (with 100 MHz FSB) and disable all power saving functions, the CPU should run always at 3.5 GHz (even when idle, but no worry, modern CPUs use very little power even if idling at full clock rate). If you have power saving enabled, the observed multiplier may fluctuate anywhere between 16 (or even 9) and 35, depending on how drastic powers saving options you use.
So actually, I was entirely wrong then!![]()
Speaking of tower coolers (is the Hyper 212 Evo a 'tower cooler'?) if you get one of those, along with a 'K' i5 processor and maybe even the second fan option on the Hyper 212 Evo, then would you be good to go for safe overclocking when the time comes?
Yeah, I've considered the 280X. Not sure if it'd be overkill or not. Decisions, decisions!![]()
You got good bang for £ there.Right, so I had £350 come my way to spend, Quite a lot for me (spare that is) and I have just gone and brought the following ...
MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC 2048MB GDDR5 PCI-Express
AMD Piledriver FX-8 Eight Core 8350 Black Edition 4.00GHz (Socket AM3+)
Pretty pleased with both of those for that price (Next day delivery as well)
I Think I'll be ok to run Elite now ... :smilie: (When the Beta comes)