So, we know Crichtonsaurus is back, but I'm wondering if it may get a rename. Crichtonsaurs is a nomen dubium. However, there is Crichtonpelta, which is basically the same animal and a properly recognized genus.
Little detail that would do a bit for the accuracy, AND even leave the reason for this animal's inclusion intact.
Little detail that would do a bit for the accuracy, AND even leave the reason for this animal's inclusion intact.