Current active forum users are 718, is this a record?
No, Most users ever online was 1,264, 30/05/2014 at 12:43 PM.
But that could change.
Current active forum users are 718, is this a record?
OMG, I thought god knew everything?
padlock view = target a ship, planet etc. and your view is locked on it... like automatic head look.. eyes fixed to the target as the ship moves. X-Wing Alliance had it and it so adds to the immersion of flight. s chuck Yeager said, loose sight - loose the flight!
...but you knew that anyway.
Thanks for the reply, means a lot.
If people won't follow the rules I can see this thread locked very soon. Only few will have their questions answered and trolls will win again
Frank - "<puff puff> Am I too late? The game is going to be peppered with tributes. If you could pay homage to only one person, who would it be?"
Well, there is already a tribute that went into Alpha 4 (and is in PB1 too), to the excellent late Colin Pillinger and his Beagle 2 spacecraft - with the station "Beagle 2 Landing".
In Frontier there were plenty of tributes too - for example to the wonderful late Richard Feynman - the planet "Feynman" as the nearest exoplanet to Earth.
I've given up blocking questions in this thread
Michael
Stellar systems that have not been explored will simply show the star or star(s) that can be seen there from a distance, and have a systematic name. Someone will have to explore them AND RETURN for them to become more generally known. They will also be able to stake a claim and name such a system.
Head trackin wouldn't be needed if this was implemented, am I correct?Padlock view sounds awful imo.
But you are going through the other thread first, aren't you?
That's how I understood it would work, and there are some people not present today who could just post in the other one, and I held back from posting in this one so far as it was clear it would be spammed.
It's fine, no need to stress. David will answer as many questions as he has time for. Hopefully there'll be future sessions as well.
Michael
But you are going through the other thread first, aren't you?
That's how I understood it would work, and there are some people not present today who could just post in the other one, and I held back from posting in this one so far as it was clear it would be spammed.
Head trackin wouldn't be needed if this was implemented, am I correct?
Head trackin wouldn't be needed if this was implemented, am I correct?