"Development Level >>"? Figuring out what all these numbers do.

hutandrei

H
He also said it was "an error and not an intentional change".
It was some serious work done on the backend of the server with different type of economies and percentages adjusted on planet types, compositions and a lot of other rules that we were still trying to figure out.
That was definitely not "unintended".

Perhaps, and I'm just guessing here, the change was intended, but not for landable worlds - that was the "error".
 
Last edited:

tomalus

T
So the people who have biowaste stations from before,will still have biowaste stations in the future.
The people who fixed their biowaste stations will have their biowaste stations restored.
The people who built new stations that has economies will convert into biowaste.
So lets say removing industry pressurew ill fix some stations.

Congratulations you just made everyone upset.
How? How do they always somehow do this.
 

Xenia_K

Xenia_K
hutandrei said:
He also said it was "an error and not an intentional change".
It was some serious work done on the backend of the server with different type of economies and percentages adjusted on planet types, compositions and a lot of other rules that we were still trying to figure out.
That was definitely not "unintended".
Click to expand...
I could imagine that it was unintended that all bodies were affected, not only those which are not landable/have no slots....

edit: ninjaéd by your edit :)
 

photomankc

photomankc
hutandrei said:
He also said it was "an error and not an intentional change".
It was some serious work done on the backend of the server with different type of economies and percentages adjusted on planet types, compositions and a lot of other rules that we were still trying to figure out.
That was definitely not "unintended".

Perhaps, and I'm just guessing here, the change was intended, but not for landable worlds - that was the "error".
Click to expand...
Question is.... why are we having to guess? A bit of detail would go a long way on this. I know they are trying to get a communication out on this which I will at least commend the effort, but god lord. That is worded so vaguely that nobody has any idea what it means. It's like the statement equivalent of an ink-blot test.

Add to that that it will take weeks for it to unwind and now nobody anywhere will have any idea what to expect and bad information is going to get spread everywhere. Wow.
 
Last edited:

Johann Potter

J
So after rollback of planet-based economy, would there be any problem if i build ground outpost and coriolis on the same body and then try to turn them to refinery with hubs after their completion?
 

hutandrei

H
Well, i'm assuming the refineries will refine minerals into metals and not biowaste, so some stuff will still be working. Unless 2 weeks from now they will refine biowaste into food cartridges ?
Who knows...
 

hutandrei

H
69704393_2332023650381408_6340747187877576704_n.jpg
 

tomalus

T
On a side not. So we have a tri economy. 1.15 extraction 1.15 Agri 0.9 refinery.
Not alot of food on the market. Do you think its because Extraction and Refinery eats it up? Would there be more food if it was only Refinery/Agri, or single market Agriculture? Thinking ahead.
 

MoridinUK

M
So now we have to test everything! Come on Fdev TELL US SOMETHING.

What was a mistake?
What was reverted?
Was it everything?

Do stars and gas giants, ELW and WW gives us stuff still or not? DO I have to waste a WW to find out? what!
 

Starsong

Starsong
tomalus said:
On a side not. So we have a tri economy. 1.15 extraction 1.15 Agri 0.9 refinery.
Not alot of food on the market. Do you think its because Extraction and Refinery eats it up? Would there be more food if it was only Refinery/Agri, or single market Agriculture? Thinking ahead.
Click to expand...
I assume so. Don't both have a demand for food?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom