To the architect?Wealth = more weekly payout
I've been getting a straight 10,000 Cr times the system score, nothing to do with wealth.
To the architect?Wealth = more weekly payout
Does anybody have a Coriolis or Asteroid base with Universal Cartographics even with a very high TechLevel?tech = number of ships/outfitting/universal cartographic/services (carrier vendor)
Maybe that tech lvl for UC has to be localized. I'm wondering if we put a research installation next to a Coriolis, will it get UC?Does anybody have a Coriolis or Asteroid base with Universal Cartographics even with a very high TechLevel?
And to be more specific, a Coriolis or Asteroid base that is not the system primary facility.
My Coriolis has no UC, and my system has a very high TechLevel.
- Fully deployed for several weeks. It has shipyard, outfitting, livery, vista genomics and functional market.
- The orbital Science Outpost it is mashed together with has UC.
Facility Summary:
- Coriolis - No UC.
- T1 Surface Science Outpost Port - No UC.
- Orbital Science Outposts (qty 2) - both have UC
- Orbital Commercial Outpost - No UC.
I rebooted two colony economy spaceports. For those keeping score these are the results.
A commercial outpost orbiting an icy body upon adding a small research settlement gave 1.15 industry + 0.3 high tech
A coriolis orbiting a non-landable HMC upon adding a research station installation gave 0.85 extraction + 0.3 high tech. The shipyard went from 7 ships available to 14 and UC has been added. (System tech level is now 22). I'll save the one remaining orbital slot for when Fdev change it all again.
Security | Tech Level | Wealth | Standard of Living | Development Level |
21 | 26 | 5 | 24 | 17 |
As mentioned, I have an Oribital Science Research station (Prometheus) with UC mashed together with the Coriolis that has no UC.Maybe that tech lvl for UC has to be localized. I'm wondering if we put a research installation next to a Coriolis, will it get UC?
My gut feel is it doesn't matter because things are apt to change several more times. And ultimately the economic relationships between facilities will eventually be standardized.I'm getting closer to finishing my coriolis, and wondering if i should hold out for until its fixed.
Long term it would be pretty bad if facilities got stuck in an 'old' economic relationship.
You could also claim more systems but only with outposts. Keep more systems available in case you need some places to experiment or test out economy builds.Well this is the fear, i guess, since thats exactly what happened when they accidentally committed the 'planet influnce' stuff last week - we had to build new structures to force an economy update.
I guess you're right though... I can leave a lot of slots open on the planet, and after this coriolis i have one (i think) orbital slot left. So if i do get 'stuck' with a poor economy, i can force a re-structuring once - but only once.
It would be nice if FDEV confirmed that eventually everybodies markets would be 'updated' in a big finalisation tick.
Yeah i think a combination of the two here, really. I'll finish the coriolis but i'll leave all the other slots on the planet below (and next to it) empty until all of this gets sorted.You could also claim more systems but only with outposts. Keep more systems available in case you need some places to experiment or test out economy builds.
That's kinda what I'm doing. I am finishing an Ocellus that is in a good location, and some installations that I think will be good no matter what happens. Then I will leave the rest of the system alone. And I might start looking for a new system that I will reserve for whenever the Trailblazers update is solid.Yeah i think a combination of the two here, really. I'll finish the coriolis but i'll leave all the other slots on the planet below (and next to it) empty until all of this gets sorted.
I have four other systems i could build up and test like you say.
I'm curious though, but how could it be worse? right now you build it an your Coriolis could be stuck forever, with a biowaste and hydrogen fuel economy.My gut feel is it doesn't matter because things are apt to change several more times. And ultimately the economic relationships between facilities will eventually be standardized.
Long term it would be pretty bad if facilities got stuck in an 'old' economic relationship. And if they do, holding off doesn't matter because it still might get stuck in a newer (but still old) economic relationship. And who know, it could be worse.
I dunno, a hydrogen/biowaste explosion?I how could it be worse? right now you build it an your Coriolis could be stuck forever, with a biowaste and hydrogen fuel economy.
Depends what you're looking for - at least Colony has a fairly coherent (and high value) set of imports, which is good for obtaining trade missions or doing normal cargo runs to get the station owner a better economic state.I'd think ANY situation where it has an economic influence on it, of some type, would be better than that?