My guess is it will that 2 slots so class 4 and up. Would love to be wrong though!I'm just waiting to see if the new SRV takes 2 slots in the Planetary Vehicle Hangar. Or a special hangar which is size 8 ;-)
Confirmed here too, i get around 30fps average while on foot (CZ)Positive signs from low-end hardware (after deleting graphics folder)
My guess is it will that 2 slots so class 4 and up. Would love to be wrong though!
Just because we get a tour of the build in development doesn't mean it'll be ready for release this year, I'm afraid. Although I certainly won't complain if it is.So... we're getting updates 9 AND 10 still this year? What a pleasant surprise.
Since FC interiors are after 9 but the tour is scheduled for December.
Yeah, I've realized it's most likely a sneak peek on stream. I somehow thought of a small expedition when I read "FC tour".Just because we get a tour of the build in development doesn't mean it'll be ready for release this year, I'm afraid. Although I certainly won't complain if it is.
maybe they’ll put some windows on the other side as well?About that FC bridge, since it shows the flight deck, we're looking backwards aren't we?
About that FC bridge, since it shows the flight deck, we're looking backwards aren't we?
Nah but there is quiet a few people who say you cannot compare ground performance to other current games due to the size or smth. Then again AC odyssey and ACV maps are larger at better graphics and better performance with more active interactions etcCan you quote the people you are disagreeing with? Nobody says the number of star systems is causing issues AFAIK.
I think you are misunderstanding what those other people are saying. You cannot compare EDO with AC, but not because of the number of stars. It's a long, long talk about many basic topics, so I am going to leave it at that.Nah but there is quiet a few people who say you cannot compare ground performance to other current games due to the size or smth. Then again AC odyssey and ACV maps are larger at better graphics and better performance with more active interactions etc
This! It would be lovely to park my T9 outside a station with small/medium pads and fly in and land with a taipan. Taking/completing Missions, stocking up on supplies, or simply to hang out.i forget to include the question if there are a possibility to be inside the fighter instead of telepresence... ? w can see that the cmdr fits there
having SLFs treated as 'landing craft' under certain situations sounds pretty fun. especially for on-foot stuff, where finding a decent spot to make landfall with something the size of the ISS might be difficult.This! It would be lovely to park my T9 outside a station with small/medium pads and fly in and land with a taipan. Taking/completing Missions, stocking up on supplies, or simply to hang out.
Cheers
DZ
Why would Frontier shoot themselves in the foot by requiring the whole DSSA fleet to return to the bubble… they wouldn’t be that short-sighted to not know how Commanders use their carriers would they? Surely, they wouldn‘t expect everyone to fly to the same few outfitting dockyards, causing instance game crashing again…
would they?
I think Frontier needs to start considering implementing the ability to place remote orders at previously visited stations. So you can buy and ship the item, Ah la Amazon or Fedex style of interaction.Why would Frontier shoot themselves in the foot by requiring the whole DSSA fleet to return to the bubble… they wouldn’t be that short-sighted to not know how Commanders use their carriers would they? Surely, they wouldn‘t expect everyone to fly to the same few outfitting dockyards, causing instance game crashing again…
would they?