arid was so ungulate heavy holy
That's just a different side of the same coin, though. Haha. To allow for variety you can really only have 1-2 of any given type of animall. But I also think the species selection is important.I dont think that its the small amount of ungulates that make wetlands, grasslands and na so well received. Its rather that the small amount of ungulates allows for other groups to be represented aswell and get more variety in.
Like wetlands has 2 ungulates, a rodent, a reptile, a bird, a monotreme, a carnivoran and even an amphibia. Its peak diversity and i really wish frontier would go back to make animal packs more similar to this againt.
What a great DLC that will never happen.Asia Animal Pack:
Golden Snub Nosed Monkey {Headliner}
Chinese Alligator
Peres David Deer
Golden Pheasant
Markhor
Honey Badger/Black Buck
Mandarin Duck
Japanese Giant Salamander [E]
I guess that’s something! I knew it! Lord of the Rings dlc how didn’t I see it sooner?Well we got some SoMe activity today...
x.com
x.com
Introducing the pony, stupidly large eagles, wargs and fell beastsI guess that’s something! I knew it! Lord of the Rings dlc how didn’t I see it sooner?
Welp arid got no excuses to not be the literal same type of deal as a general worldwide desert pack and yes that would have made people far less annoyed as it would have forced diversity go figure. Swapping out the rhino, one antelope and the donkey for lets say the collared peccary they were cooking anyways and an australian monitor and the yellow footed rock wallaby then wed be with a similar amount of "clones" and im sure people would still be upset about the lack of a baboon and bird with people cursing at the second monitor but it certanly wouldnt be the sad joke that gets brought up every time people talk about the worst pack. Even just changing one of the ungulates to the tortoise would have softend the blow by alot.That's just a different side of the same coin, though. Haha. To allow for variety you can really only have 1-2 of any given type of animall. But I also think the species selection is important.
I do recall people being really confused by the addition of the buffalo and lechwe for wetlands. People were generally accepting of the wildebeest for grasslands (which was interesting) but there was still an err of "but that could have been something else."
What's interesting too is that the two packs we're discussing also had geographic diversity and offered up something new/different that could be used beyond the pack (e.g., the enrichment items from wetlands; the butterfly houses and pieces from grasslands) which further helps things along.
It's a precarious balance they have to strike!
Oceania Pack 2Maybe is the Oceanía pack part 2
Another Oceania pack without my precious Victoria Crowned Pigeon?Oceania Pack 2
Tree kangaroo
Australian Sea Lion/Leopard Seal/Crabeater Seal
Short-Beaked Echidna
Southern Rockhopper Penguin/Royal Penguin
Common Brushtail Possum/Perentie
Numbat/Tiger quoll
Kakapo
Sugar glider/Budgies [WTE]
planet zoo hates pigeons im not even sure they can even get the numbat or tiger quoll in without making the rest of the animals look like dishwashed 2.0 versionsAnother Oceania pack without my precious Victoria Crowned Pigeon?
It’s actually kinda upsetting the wasted potential in so many packs last year, arid and tropical could’ve been incredible packs and although I think Eurasia was less wasted potential there was definitely still someWelp arid got no excuses to not be the literal same type of deal as a general worldwide desert pack and yes that would have made people far less annoyed as it would have forced diversity go figure. Swapping out the rhino, one antelope and the donkey for lets say the collared peccary they were cooking anyways and an australian monitor and the yellow footed rock wallaby then wed be with a similar amount of "clones" and im sure people would still be upset about the lack of a baboon and bird with people cursing at the second monitor but it certanly wouldnt be the sad joke that gets brought up every time people talk about the worst pack. Even just changing one of the ungulates to the tortoise would have softend the blow by alot.
Like sheesh imagine having animal quality of frontier at its best but still being regulary ranked below arctic, now thats a blow
Tropical Pack was perfect, I have no idea why I would not be.It’s actually kinda upsetting the wasted potential in so many packs last year, arid and tropical could’ve been incredible packs and although I think Eurasia was less wasted potential there was definitely still some
If i remember correctly the confusion came from the buffalo not being the domestic variety and the lechwe being a generally not well known animal.That's just a different side of the same coin, though. Haha. To allow for variety you can really only have 1-2 of any given type of animall. But I also think the species selection is important.
I do recall people being really confused by the addition of the buffalo and lechwe for wetlands. People were generally accepting of the wildebeest for grasslands (which was interesting) but there was still an err of "but that could have been something else."
What's interesting too is that the two packs we're discussing also had geographic diversity and offered up something new/different that could be used beyond the pack (e.g., the enrichment items from wetlands; the butterfly houses and pieces from grasslands) which further helps things along.
It's a precarious balance they have to strike!
if we got a duck during that pack it would be a waterfowl disasterIf i remember correctly the confusion came from the buffalo not being the domestic variety and the lechwe being a generally not well known animal.
But tbh i can see why the went with these two. Having a domestic animal in a biome pack just feels kinda wrong as they arent really part of the wild. And the lechwe was also something new as a water adjecent antilope, still i think pretty much everyone would have prefered a duck or something here but that doesnt mean the lechwe was a bad pick.
I think people generally were accepting of the wildebeest for multiple reason. The first is that grasslands are prime ungulate, and specifically antelope habitat, so i think pretty much everyone already expected there to be one. Looking back im honestly surprised we only got one ungulate in grasslands.
And the second and likely bigger reason is that its and upgrade to the basegame black wildebeest in every single way, its way more iconic, more common and looks infinetly better
I think Eurasia was fine for it's theme but i would've swapped the saiga for the blackbuck or the Palla's cat or heck even the markhor. I've come to accept the wisent do to their importance as iconic European fauna and Conservation value but i still think it was better suited as anniversary gift rather that takin a spot in DLC.It’s actually kinda upsetting the wasted potential in so many packs last year, arid and tropical could’ve been incredible packs and although I think Eurasia was less wasted potential there was definitely still some
Arid could’ve been a banger either as a African only pack or a global pack
1. Crested Porcupine
2. Dromedary
3. Hamadryas Baboon
4. Honey Badger
5. African Spurred Tortoise
6. Grey Crowned Crane
7. Secretary Bird
1. Crested Porcupine
2. Hamadryas Baboon
3. Secretary Bird
4. Blackbuck
5. Greater Rhea
6. Patagonian Mara
7. Grey Crowned Crane
Tropical should’ve been an animal pack
1. Spider or Howler Monkey
2. Coati
3. Roseate Spoonbill
4. Fossa
5. Red River Hog
6. Mantles Guereza
7. Victoria Crowned Pigeon
Eurasia should’ve had more range across the continent as opposed to just cold themed
1. Wild Boar
2. Wolverine
3. Mute Swan
4. Blackbuck
5. Langur
6. Takin
7. Himalayan Monal