Totally agreed. Even though it won't work in Elite, even though the gameplay of NMS wouldn't be my thing. I do like the 50's sci fi book cover art looks of NMS.Bloody hell can we stop the snidey digs at NMS for christsakes? It's SUPPOSED to look like psychedelic 70's album art, known from the start and a conscious art choice by the devs.....gawds sake, it was never supposed to be realistic.
personally I find 70's album art better than 70's toilet suites for colour.
some colour is needed, within the obvious "science" boundaries.
That's exactly it. I would love not to have to beg for feedback. I have been a little absent from these forums for longer times lately, because I found myself only posting complaints and only engage in useless discussions (edit: as I'm doing again now, so .... ), while I should be posting about stuff I found. I should be showing screenshots of the stuff I found. But a couple of weeks ago realisation hit me. I went from the Bubble, to Colonia visiting about 30 Planetary Nebulae I found, so the trip was about 40KLY. In all that time I took 3 screenshots. And those where mainly to see how the new Camera Suite worked. Elite used to be a virus on my computer, hogging up screenshot space in the Gigabytes. Many of those from HMCs with a close moon or nebulae or something else to fill the skybox. Now it's just enter system. Any ELWs, WWs, Aws? No? Next system. Yes? Scan and next system. So I'm just doing it for the money now. I am exploring for money.I don't explore at all, so this isn't as much an issue for me as it is others. However, with that said, given the premise of this title I cannot understand why Frontier haven't acted on this sooner. They could at least give an explanation about why it's not been fixed. If it involves work that is required to make future inclusions work, then say so. I am sure the majority of the player base would be happy enough if they knew that it was going to be part of an general overhaul that included more than what we had prior rather than a simple return to what we had prior.