Salome was killed because of a perfect storm of naivety and hubris on the part of people who should have known better.
That's the gullibility to which I was referring. Same sentiment, different turn of phrase.
Drew was well aware of the fact that Salome could be killed (indeed believed it was a strong possibility) and had already prepared for such an eventuality.
Yes, I know. He said so repeatedly in the Formidine Rift thread. My confusion was in interpreting something he said to mean that Harry Potter was an NPC. Acidburn pointed me at an article that straightened that out, all the way to Harry Potter's real name.
Unlike those who appointed themselves Salome's 'protectors' who said 'Potter? Yes, of course you can join us in protecting Salome. Can't see ANYTHING going wrong there'. Instead of issuing a KoS policy of anyone and everyone who has ever been even suspected of 'Emergent Game Play' (which for the record I consider to be the ONLY worthy aspect of that whole sorry affair) they decided instead to wave their epeens around telling everyone they couldn't bring weapons or they would be shot on sight. It was a farce, and the lowest low of the community I have experienced so far.
Seems to me the first problem is that rather than using Children of Raxxla, as had previously been the case throughout the story line, someone decided to create a whole new group. Then they let those "emergent game play professionals" in. How could that have not gone bad? I can't see this as anything but a plan intended to fail. While it may not have been intentional, unless the intent was to kill off the Salome story line it was not at all clever.
In this case "emergent game play" is a politically correct phrase meaning "break the game for everyone but us". Exactly how was killing Salome supposed to cause FDev to create a better story? The UA bombing of Dove Enigma was also called "emergent game play" even though it was really just a bad thing to do (phrasing cleaned up extensively). Did it turn out well? Yes. Was that their plan? Please. I'm far too old to be that gullible. They find amusement in forcing others to dance to their tune. The biggest single annoyance I see in this is that I am required to be nice to them while they do things that screw up everyone else's game.
Is all "emergent game play" bad? Of course not. This sort of conduct, however, is bad behavior hiding behind an acceptable turn of phrase.
I'm not sure whether you're actually agreeing with me or not by your last comment but Harry Potter is not a concern on the PS4.
I fully understand that Harry Potter is on Windows while I am on PS4. I also understand that the things done by people on Windows can affect all platforms. What happens if the people running the show get smoked by an "emergent game play professional"? I keep going anyway. The question is whether overall that's a good thing or a bad thing. Further, neither of us know whether there are "emergent game play professionals" on PS4. Two guys who bought ED because I play quit because of what appears to have been "seal clubbing". They played on PS4. I told them to join Mobius but they didn't get there quickly enough. I also told them to play in Solo, which they didn't do either. Of course it was their naivety that pushed them away. That doesn't change the nature of the conduct of the seal clubbers.
There was at least one griefer at the start of Grand Day Out, despite lots of people talking a lot about how they were going to be combat escorts. However it was only at the starting station and a simple block player fixed that for me. Just turn up in a cheap ship, transfer your exploration ship over and scope things out before you set off is my advice to anyone (or just fly in solo for the first few jumps).
I'm a member of four PvE private groups. I'll do ok. Still, I find it interesting the Harry Potter is still messing with people, which is why I mentioned it in the first place. Of course, his behavior was reinforced as not unacceptable. Why would anyone think he'd not continue?