That could be non stellar hot object ... who knows. Point is ....remember it was in galaxy news almost year ago - guy stole ship and had visions of light etc. Well, if you go to one of such NS in list you will see his vision on your screen. So next logical step is to check if there is any other object such hot.Not sure what you're looking for. Neutron Stars and White Dwarfs have distinctive graphical effects, because of what they are. Any other hot star will just look like regular stars, but with a color matching their temperature. So you'd just be looking at O-class blue stars, mostly.
But that is massive NS in witchspace. Other objects aren't so bright ...or get close to picture last moment. But this one is such since 1st moment till last.If my memory serves me right, that looks like a White Dwarf in Witchspace.
What the graphs also appear to illustrate is that there is far more exploration activity now than there was in, say, August 2018... So all of the naysayers who say exploration is dead since December 2018 are proven wrongAdded a couple of graphs.
Bodies per system, per day. I've capped the graph at 25 for the moment because of those anomalous days where the numbers went over 80, and I want the rest of the graph to be visible. The next run will bring the cap down to 15. It'll automatically undo the cap if it starts getting a bunch of days that go over it again.
And based on the same data, here's the view as overall submissions per day, not divided into the system count:
These graphs make it super obvious when the FSS was introduced, and the DW2 exploration spike.
Just noticed another error on that graph: Planets seems to include Stars as well. If it were Bodies, that would be correct. The labels on bodiespersystem.png are wrong, but that's just text. That might also count Stars in the Bodies / Systems, it's a bit more difficult to tell - plus it might be intended.
EDIT: I suspect it's because it's skipping systems without coordinates. Arg. It was doing that because of the altitude graphs. I'll see if I can separate that out better.