I absolutely agree that making a useful and compreheisive model for ship comparison is a total beast on its own and 'x better that y' conclusion is purely intention/purpose driven but it's not about that. What I hoped to achieve is some reasonable uniformity, like all ships having 2 S fixed pulse lasers in default loadout be it S, M or L ship. Is having those useful for combat appraise - not at all, but it's uniform across ships. What I had in mind on FSD regard - either use values non-SCO E grade for 'New tech' ships or SCO E grade for 'Old tech' which makes approach uniform and therefore more useful IMO. But that's, of course, is up to author/maintainer discretion)
Release EDSY - The ship outfitting tool formerly known as E:D Shipyard; reimagined, redesigned, reborn
- Thread starter taleden
- Start date
ref. to screenshots below, at the moment, in game we are allowed to equip Mk II E/B passenger cabins in all available slots, while EDSY 4.23.3.1 allow only in specialized slot*, tbh we need to check if is normal or a FDev release bug, anyway for actual setup it is not restricted.
was told "between the lines" by Fdev on ship launch post
New Ship: Zorgon Peterson introduces the Lynx Highliner
Entering into the passenger liner market for the first time, Zorgon Peterson introduces the Lynx Highliner. This impressive medium-class vessel sets a new benchmark for high-capacity travel, accommodating up to 225 passengers. Destined to become the centrepiece of everyday space travel, the Lynx...
"Destined to become the centrepiece of everyday space travel, the Lynx Highliner features both Economy and Business class and can be outfitted with advanced Mk II cabins."
Zorgon Peterson is not for "luxury", that is Saud Kruger, ZP is everyday and rescue rugged... let's justify it by "storytelling" it this way
There is a reason I used the word "any".......was told "between the lines" by Fdev on ship launch post
New Ship: Zorgon Peterson introduces the Lynx Highliner
Entering into the passenger liner market for the first time, Zorgon Peterson introduces the Lynx Highliner. This impressive medium-class vessel sets a new benchmark for high-capacity travel, accommodating up to 225 passengers. Destined to become the centrepiece of everyday space travel, the Lynx...forums.frontier.co.uk
"Destined to become the centrepiece of everyday space travel, the Lynx Highliner features both Economy and Business class and can be outfitted with advanced Mk II cabins."
Zorgon Peterson is not for "luxury", that is Saud Kruger, ZP is everyday and rescue rugged... let's justify it by "storytelling" it this way
Edit: Forced a refresh and it's picking them back up on the Beluga and Dolphin
Hello! I am addicted to EDSY. I love it. Congratulations!
Is there any built in way of knowing if my browser is showing the latest version, or if I need to update it? (I am eagerly waiting for the thermal data to be available for the Lynx.)
There's a version number in the top right of EDSY. You shouldn't need to do anything. I've never once needed to clear browser cache or cookies for it to properly update.
If you do need to clear those, make sure you back up all your data (click the ？
HELP button at the top, then scroll down to the BACKUP ALL DATA button) since all your saved ships are stored with your browser.
Shouldn't need to do that, either. Just ctrl + shift + R (or ctrl/shift + F5) while on the webpage, will bypass the cache and cause it to update upon refreshing.There's a version number in the top right of EDSY. You shouldn't need to do anything. I've never once needed to clear browser cache or cookies for it to properly update.
If you do need to clear those, make sure you back up all your data (click the ？
I couldn't find any reference to this, although it has probably been mentioned somewhere, but does EDSY somehow confuse Sub-Space Displacement Missiles with Sub-Space Extraction Missiles, as it is only the latter, a tool for "mining" humans, which appears as the possible module for a specialised mining slot on a Type-11 Prospector build?
Although the actual mining module, the Sub-Surface Displacement Missile, can appear on builds presumably extracted from elsewhere, the issue appears to be on the "create a new" build in EDSY side, where it apparently cannot be selected from the options for that slot, with just the Extraction "variant" being selectable.
Although the actual mining module, the Sub-Surface Displacement Missile, can appear on builds presumably extracted from elsewhere, the issue appears to be on the "create a new" build in EDSY side, where it apparently cannot be selected from the options for that slot, with just the Extraction "variant" being selectable.
The sub-surface displacement missile should be the unlabeled "1B" and "2B" options under the "Mining Tools - Launchers" section. I can place these missiles on every slot of the Type-11 as of v4.23.3.2
What had thrown me was that i had imported an attractive build, linked in a Reddit post, into my target build, against my ship on Inara. When I thought I'd built the Type-11 in ED, the comparison tab on Inara was reporting that the Sub-surface Displacement Missile, that I had actually fitted to the ship, differed from the Sub-Surface Extraction Missile that was reported as being required, in the Target build tab. Maybe Inara's import has an issue or maybe I'm just losing my mind???
The ship is all good, so no worries and thanks for the rapid response.
Edit:
The link to the post containing the build in question is:-
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteMiners/comments/1rxntdi/looking_for_recommendations_for_a_type_11/
..and to the build itself:-
Last edited:
It is whoever created the build that must have confused the Sub-surface Displacement Missile (the regular mining tool) with the Sub-surface Extraction Missile (the currently-useless Thargoid pod extraction tool).What had thrown me was that i had imported an attractive build, linked in a Reddit post, into my target build, against my ship on Inara. When I thought I'd built the Type-11 in ED, the comparison tab on Inara was reporting that the Sub-surface Displacement Missile, that I had actually fitted to the ship, differed from the Sub-Surface Extraction Missile that was reported as being required, in the Target build tab. […]
The link to […] the build itself:-
I cannot check it in-game right now, but it is quite possible that both can be fitted into the specialised mining slots of T-11, as they can in EDSY. (As mentioned above, the SSDMs are labelled simply “1B/F”, “2B/F” etc. in the left panel, where “F” is actually the fixed-sight symbol.)
When i'd spotted the alleged discrepancy on Inara, I'd actually tried to go into ED to change it to the "right" module, to find that there was no option for the Extraction mod. That's when i did a bit of reading up and found that the extraction mod was for mining humans rather than ore, so probably not what the T-11 was built for.
I've been getting the same error for weeks. Kind of glad to see it's not just me.
The V shortlink option fails with HTTP 400. It's possible the API changed the parameters. Trying it directly tells that the database insert fails (it's likely the site is broken).
The Ulvis shortlink option fails with HTTP 403 because it is intercepted by Cloudflare and fails because the way it is constructed cannot complete the anti-bot challenge.
Ulvis still works if you visit Ulvis directly and try to shorten the EDSY link manually.
The Ulvis shortlink option fails with HTTP 403 because it is intercepted by Cloudflare and fails because the way it is constructed cannot complete the anti-bot challenge.
Ulvis still works if you visit Ulvis directly and try to shorten the EDSY link manually.
Last edited: