Who has a coordinate close to sagA? I'm on my way back and need some neutrons. What confusing is that I was flying through them nearly all the way to sagA, but I've yet to find one again yet.
Who has a coordinate close to sagA? I'm on my way back and need some neutrons. What confusing is that I was flying through them nearly all the way to sagA, but I've yet to find one again yet.
Another belt of neutron stars, white dwarves and black holes can be found around -3410, 1114, 11130 (PRU AIM KO-O D7-89). All the stars you can eat!
I am pretty much 2500ly directly ahead of you! I've changed my mind and decided to "surface" and hit a couple of planetary nebulae on the way before diving again and heading towards Great Annihilator.The easiest way may be to go to Galaxy Map, zoom out a few clicks, drop about 600-1000ly down in elevation, and start "flying" towards home. Use the star map and filter non-sequence stars.
Screenshot enclosed - I have a straight-line view to NGC 6357 and Lugh (home base). EESHORKS AA-A nebula is in the vicinity. This is just the non-sequence, carbon, and white dwarf stars in one grid. The grids keep going and going. This is 17k ly from Lugh, so if you're coming from Sag A* and heading back, they're 8k ly or less from your position. A great place to get lost. Safe flying, CMDR!
Neutron Stars... considerably more dangerous than Black Holes. How does that work?
(Actually I know, it's the 10,000,000k surface temperature as opposed to 0k, but it still seems counter intuitive).
Have some +rep for "going big or going home" - that's a serious farming mission right there !10 days of neutron farming...320 neutrons per day...
You hit it on the head. Since gravity strength varies as the inverse square of the distance, for all practical purposes the gravitational danger posed by a neutron star is equivalent to that posed by a black hole (both being incredibly compacts massive bodies that pose significant danger due to tidal disruption to any normal matter that gets fairly close). However, unless the black hole has an accretion disk (and most probably won't), the black hole doesn't radiate in any significant amount, so the only danger from the black hole is confined to the tidal disruption caused by the gravity relatively close to the event horizon. The neutron star, on the other hand, is likely radiating x-rays up to gamma rays in immense quantities, posing a danger far beyond the tidal disruption distance.
Neutron Stars... considerably more dangerous than Black Holes. How does that work?
(Actually I know, it's the 10,000,000k surface temperature as opposed to 0k, but it still seems counter intuitive).
The neutron star, on the other hand, is likely radiating x-rays up to gamma rays in immense quantities, posing a danger far beyond the tidal disruption distance.