Engineers FD is it possible to get a 3F / 4F corrosive resistant cargo rack?

The CG for CRCR wasn't supported well enough, hence our reward of only 2t,which is what I read. I doubt we'll get 4/8t
 
The CG for CRCR wasn't supported well enough, hence our reward of only 2t,which is what I read. I doubt we'll get 4/8t

The CG-goal was not explained properly. Don't recall what kind it was, but I think the tiers was a tad out of balance so to speak.
Nobody knew what was at stake as well as FD was still learning how to balance the tiering.

4/8T would be very much appreciated.
 
The CG for CRCR wasn't supported well enough, hence our reward of only 2t,which is what I read. I doubt we'll get 4/8t

The CG-goal was not explained properly. Don't recall what kind it was, but I think the tiers was a tad out of balance so to speak.
Nobody knew what was at stake as well as FD was still learning how to balance the tiering.

4/8T would be very much appreciated.

isn't it amazing, that player choice and actions have lasting and consistent consequence in the shared galaxy, like: a CG not suceeding leading to no corrosive racks of a bigger size being available?

would making them available suddenly not destroy this amazing exampel of how player actions shape the games world?

maybe a new CG could fix it?
 
as this would make the smaller ships a lot more versatile

which smaller ships are you referring to? DBS, eagle, sidey?

because a CMKIV or t6 has more than enough internals for 2 resistant bargo racks. finally a use-case for my CMKIV!
 
The CG-goal was not explained properly. Don't recall what kind it was, but I think the tiers was a tad out of balance so to speak.
Nobody knew what was at stake as well as FD was still learning how to balance the tiering.

4/8T would be very much appreciated.

If everyone that participated put in the number I did it would have hit 1.6M tonnes delivered. That would at least be 4/8T, probably close to completion.
 
Back
Top Bottom