Its a constant thats been picked up by quite a view books so far. The older you get the less adaptable you become. You think more often of "the good old days" and have problems adjusting to changes in society or technical advancements. I m at a point where certain "improvements" dont hit me as such. There are things out there representing a new trend that I
simply dont understand as they leave me confused. Why do we need to invent new words and terms when established ones do the job? So I refuse to use them but doing so only demonstrizes how I m unable to cope whereas in younger years I probably would have embraced such change (clothe fashion is a great example too)
Vampire novels used this fact to weave in the view of an immortal which I personally find fascinating. Living forever is one of humanities dreams. Nobody wants to die...but things change when you get older because life at 99 isnt as much "fun" as it is when you are 25. Now vampire novels describe entities that walk through a world they dont understand anymore. They come from an age where most services of today were either not existing or they didnt need em in the first place because they had the required skill to overcome problems (think of what you gonna do if all supermarkets close or there are no craftsmen around to do all the things you need doing all of a sudden). It probably wouldnt be as bad if everybody would life forever but immortality was usually investigated from the viewpoint of an exception. One immortal in a sea of day flies. One week from now all your friends are dead, all their children and childrens children are dead. Instead the world is filled with strangers who talk funny, have very strange views and go down a route you cannot understand. Are you really going to adapt to THEM when YOU are the superior one? Are you really going to think you are wrong when you have lived a thousand times longer then anybody else on the planet? Other people are infants compared to you. Their believes, their knowledge....its laughable compared to you.
My wifes father has worked all his life as an electrician and I consider him technically very adapt even tho he isnt as agile as I am when it comes to online media or technical gadgets. Now his SON who is about 34 years younger chose the same profession as his father and they regulary clash whenever there is a project in the house that requires an electricians touch. Who takes the lead? Why cannot they use the same terms? The father approaches things as he did all his life and that enabled him to provide for his family. He will not budge on certain steps and how to do them. While his son who studied a more "advanced" version disregards his views as outdated and tells him that "this is how we do things today dad".
And this is a single generation..it gets more extreme the wider the age chasm with a max of about 70 years today.
The responsible factor in all this is of course age and physical deterioation. If we all stayed 22 forever I have no doubt that we would keep our vigor, our adaptability etc. But even if our bodies stay young the MIND ages. If it didnt that would mean we couldnt change, couldnt develop so as I see it growing older and becoming "stiffer" when it comes to new stuff is a fact and constant that will continue. Whoever today thinks "oh the old people always preaching about the golden days and complaining how everything was better in their time but cannot use a smartphone".....I promise you....you will be at the exact same point in 40 or 50 years...maybe...if you are willing to self-reflect and be honest with yourself (a lot of people never grow up) but if you dont accept this you will just become resentful and angry.
Awww sorry for the rant...its a question I was spending a lot of time on while cycling