Oh look, people feeling entitled about things that don't matter. Actively looking for ways to limit FDEV's profitability. You DO want expansions, RIGHT?
Oh look, people feeling entitled about things that don't matter. Actively looking for ways to limit FDEV's profitability. You DO want expansions, RIGHT?
Oh look, people feeling entitled about things that don't matter. Actively looking for ways to limit FDEV's profitability. You DO want expansions, RIGHT?
Unfair trading rules exist to protect the consumer and DO matter and everyone IS entitled to have those rules followed by any company.
Considering the limitless variety of skins that could be designed (and sold) - and for quite a few different types of ships - I'm not even sure if it makes sense to deem any one skin as "lustworthy"
What would be nice, is a "skin designer kit" where you could apply different solids and textures to your ship from an in-station shop. Perhaps not all the skins would be available at all the stations - so you'd have to fly to "rare" livery shops to hunt out designs you might want (paying for them with CR, not $).
Oh look, people feeling entitled about things that don't matter. Actively looking for ways to limit FDEV's profitability. You DO want expansions, RIGHT?
Effect on profitability overall is not clear. If they are putting paint jobs back on sale that they were previously advertising at premium prices as a limited edition, they won't be able to play that trick again because nobody will believe them next time - all paint jobs from now on will have to be at the lowest price.
Have they put the paint jobs they were selling for £10 each as limited editions back on as well?
Ok, serious face on now.
How is the consumer being treated unfairly, in this regard (offline mode is certainly worth the ire)? We are talking about embellishments that provide no financial, tactical or substantive advantage to the purchaser.
Perhaps my knowledge of consumer protection is a bit shoddy...
Also, limited time offer means limited time, not never again time. The McDonald's McRib is limited time offer every time they roll out the rotting pig meat wagon.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284446/oft979.pdf
The following practices are banned outright:
6.Limited time only
Falsely stating that a product will only be available for a very
limited time, or that it will only be available on particular
terms for a very limited time, in order to elicit an immediate
decision and deprive consumers of sufficient opportunity
or time to make an informed choice.
I have no issue with buying skins - I've even come to accept that both the Viper and Hauler packs are half price at 2 and 1 month after they were £10, even if that is also a bit shady (ramp it up 100x, what if a 4K TV you wanted was £1000 when released then 2 months later the shops dropped it to £500 after you bought it)
Wow, that is some nanny government hand holding if I ever saw it. But, really reading it, what did Frontier do wrong here. It was offered for a limited time. That time ended. It was unavailable, now they are available again. This seems like a new instance to me....hmm
Early adopters always pay a premium? I never complained that my plasma tv cost me $3000 USD...that same TV was sold for $499 Christmas...about 9 months after I purchased it.
^^ExactlyEarly adopters always pay a premium? I never complained that my plasma tv cost me $3000 USD...that same TV was sold for $499 Christmas...about 9 months after I purchased it.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284446/oft979.pdf
The following practices are banned outright:
6.Limited time only
Falsely stating that a product will only be available for a very
limited time, or that it will only be available on particular
terms for a very limited time, in order to elicit an immediate
decision and deprive consumers of sufficient opportunity
or time to make an informed choice.
Absolutely right!Anyway, the point I was making is Frontier can do what they like - it's their store - but the next time I see something as "LIMITED ONE TIME OFFER ONLY" I'll have second thoughts about buying it if this is their take on the definition.
I mean, continuing this logic, shouldn't backers be peeved that other people are getting the game for cheaper now?