actually they cant in a reliable way...if that play style includes grouping/chatting or any social interaction
Don't you have Skype/TS/Facebook/reddit/forums/IRC/phone/next sofa contact data for your real friends? That's such a shame.
actually they cant in a reliable way...if that play style includes grouping/chatting or any social interaction
Let us make our own game.
Corporations, are needed.
Player controlled statuons, are needed
etc.
Here's a suggestion: Before shutting the lad down lets sincerely hear what he's requesting. He enjoys ED as a game but wants players to be able to play a larger role in the world. Perhaps instead of telling him to go play EVE someone might explain why they don't want an EVE style player-shaped world.
i myself am personally indifferent and just want the damn persistent universe simulator to function all on its own.
Well to be fair if player coordination wasn't important then 1.2 wings wouldn't be such a big deal. it clearly does matter to have SOME game support for it - though one can argue to what extent.Don't you have Skype/TS/Facebook/reddit/forums/IRC/phone/next sofa contact data for your real friends? That's such a shame.
if i can chime in here,.. I LOVED EVE..even though it took actual YEARS to get a lvl5 mastery cert, but I love ED even more. There are a few things imo that are missing from this game.1) The abiliity to set a station as "home" would be great, or even the ability to set a marker or markers.2) player inventory and 3) a player trade system. none of these are synonymous with eve or any other game but would greatly add to the sim-ness of the experience.
You should listen to what DBOBE has to say on the matter of guilds/corps/clans (from 20:33):
[video=youtube;7HOUQN_qaHI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7HOUQN_qaHI&x-yt-ts=1422579428&x-yt-cl=85114404[/video]
PFFT, David Braben says a lot of things - very few of them have turned up in the game.
Well to be fair if player coordination wasn't important then 1.2 wings wouldn't be such a big deal. it clearly does matter to have SOME game support for it - though one can argue to what extent.
Don't you have Skype/TS/Facebook/reddit/forums/IRC/phone/next sofa contact data for your real friends? That's such a shame.
I don't want player owned stations bored of that mechanic tbf. What I would like is huge player owned ships where my mates and I could fly about together manning weapons, flying, sitting in ten forward looking out the window watching the Feds blow to bits as the rest of our crew run a blockade with all beams firing and the captain ordering flank speed.
If few of the things that he has mentioned, as you suggest, have turned up in the game, how likely is it, do you think, that something that he has specifically said that he does not want to see in the game will be implemented?
How, in any way could this be considered forcing?
That's a quite odd reaction - its normal I think that players wants to socialize and chat IN the bloody game without using external tools?
If few of the things that he has mentioned, as you suggest, have turned up in the game, how likely is it, do you think, that something that he has specifically said that he does not want to see in the game will be implemented?
i was there mate since beta opened and the 84 crowd shouted down anyone that suggested mordn features....and the gameplay has evolved quite a bit since then....he also sold this as a mmmo and muliplayer ands so many other features that either arent ingame or have never worked properly for more then a few days at best....ive been in mmos since jumpgate mate im no newb here .
the game needs mordern features and the infrastructure to support them...no on has to be in a guild or a group...but atm since the lack of features we cant at all ...we want the option the freedom to be affiliated with who we want...
i dont want anyone to have to do anything including being unable to play with mates...as it is right now
modern features...group/social/clan features interactions
What he actually said was: "at least to start with, we don't have guilds or clans" followed by "it something we've looked at and are looking at".
problem is not "guilds or clans" but the following demand of designing special content for them.
i think THAT is something they don't want to touch with a very long pole... and right so.