So you think that if they had more keys they would give them to people whose content they don't seem to approve of? Not convinced.Assume the limit of keys is true, they have to decide who they allocate them to - and Y didn't make the cut for the reasons given in the second email. Seems all pretty congruent to me.
No, both can be true though - they didn't have enough keys and he didn't get one for that reason as he was too low on the pecking order due to his style which doesn't gel with FD's corporate culture, and even if they did he still wouldn't get one for the same reason. They just tried to be polite in their first reply but felt to be more explicit hence the second (somewhat poorly worded, granted) response when pressed.So you think that if they had more keys they would give them to people whose content they don't seem to approve of? Not convinced.
But it didn't clarify - it changed their reason
Email 1 : We ran out of keys - soz!
Email 2: We don't like your stuff - no key!
So you think that if they had more keys they would give them to people whose content they don't seem to approve of? Not convinced.
That is true, bit the first reason is a practicality, the second reason is a moral choice. They have done themselves no favours here.Both are not mutually exclusive though if you think about it.
Assume the limit of keys is true, they have to decide who they allocate them to - and Y didn't make the cut for the reasons given in the second email. Seems all pretty congruent to me.
But it doesn't clarify their first position. It is a new position.
Okay, I believe that they may have had limited keys. They just tried to blow him off with that story.
A second message that clarifies would be showing communications they had with Steam (or whoever) sating the keys were limited. That clarifies it.
I don't believe that. You give him too much weight or over estimate their fear of him. They have a proven track record in trying to be politically correct.
Obviously there are a few contributing here that think that way...I would also suggest that the number of copies sold due to subscribers actually turning their back on the game because 'FDev were mean to him' will be negligible. Does anyone actually think like that?
Either way, it was poor comms. Have the courage of your convictions. Say it, say it hard. If you believe his tone is offensive, say that.Additional reasons.
First response boilerplate response.
Second was after it got kicked upstairs.
Which should have been FDs reply to theYamiks, because:...Alpha is open to anyone, the entry ticket is just few tens of dollars, there's no NDA, so anyone can praise or spit on it...
---------...FDEV just don't want to do him a favor knowing he already decided on his bias. They just don't want to endorse his pov...
Because of what FD actually did reply. Moronic behaviour.I don't get why trying to find more than this in FDEV's reaction.
Yeah, truth be told if the issue was just having a key available, I'm sure Steam could have arranged them one more (or even more likely, they have some spare keys in case Braben wants to hand out them at a cocktail party or something).Same, i don't think Yamiks was getting a key regardless.
Stop with that "decent guy" stuff, please. It doesn't matter.Well, he didn't, because in the middle of all the profanity he seems to be a pretty decent guy.
Nah - they wouldn't have given him anything anyway. That thing they said about not having enough keys was just a way to let him down gently. But he obviously didn't get the hint, so they had to be straight about it.No, both can be true though - they didn't have enough keys and he didn't get one for that reason as he was too low on the pecking order due to his style which doesn't gel with FD's corporate culture, and even if they did he still wouldn't get one for the same reason. They just tried to be polite in their first reply but felt to be more explicit hence the second (somewhat poorly worded, granted) response when pressed.
I agree, FD should have told him to fart off immediately. But in the end, the same result was achieved.Either way, it was poor comms. Have the courage of your convictions. Say it, say it hard. If you believe his tone is offensive, say that.
Don't you think the second message is slightly undermined by not saying it straight away? People in this thread are still desperate to believe that it is simply because he is critical of the game. They're not going to buy the second message any more than the first. They should have been clear. This would have been an entirely different thread if they had.I agree, FD should have told him to fart off immediately. But in the end, the same result was achieved.![]()